Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who is #Qanon? (really interesting 19:30 video)
YouTube ^ | 4/27/2018 | Titus Frost

Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister

This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 4chan; 69chan; 8chan; 9chan; anon; banq; bs; cia; dailyqthread; democrats; larp; larpers; larping; msm; nomoreq; nsa; q; qanon; qbs; qisfake; qislarp; qrghey; qtards; republicans; trump; trustmueller; trustsessions; whitehats; zotplease; zotq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,941-1,9601,961-1,9801,981-2,000 ... 2,061-2,068 next last
To: Fantasywriter

This is the most interesting Corsi tweet:

Jerome Corsi
@jerome_corsi
·

(link: http://8ch.net/qresearch2gen)

8ch.net/qresearch2gen created as secondary board full of depressed anons, convinced original #QAnon identity was hijacked long ago. When “New Q” took over 4/29, qresearch2gen were like, “ho hum who cares same old same old” ORIGINAL #QAnon CodeMonkey still denying hacks @POTUS


1,961 posted on 05/10/2018 4:06:01 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1960 | View Replies]

To: bagster

aha, haven’t you noticed, on FR everything must be beaten to death.....especially “taking flak over target” and other stale trite metaphors, memes, etc. Porn site viruses is just another one. Try to enjoy. :^)


1,962 posted on 05/10/2018 4:15:07 PM PDT by Enchante ("Don't believe every bit of crap you read on the internet." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1783 --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1951 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Under the bus you go Corsi.

@jerome_corsi
11m11 minutes ago

#QAnon doesn’t have to worry. I have STOPPED supporting or decoding #Qanon after concluding AUTHENTIC Q (military intelligence close to Gen Flynn) completed mission 4/28 w Nakasone taking control of NSA & House INTEL Comm GOP report FLYNN DID NOT LIE. I will support @Potus w/o Q


1,963 posted on 05/10/2018 4:18:45 PM PDT by corlorde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1961 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
haven’t you noticed, on FR everything must be beaten to death.....

Yes. That is ordinary.

That's why I strive to be extraordinary.

(running gags excepted).

Do better.

1,964 posted on 05/10/2018 4:28:24 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1962 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter; corlorde; caww; Reily; Basket_of_Deplorables; Electric Graffiti; eyedigress

I loved a Q-drop back in Dec., something like “The World Cannot Handle the Truth” — yeah whatever dark conpiracies are to be revealed, only the brave Q-bots are REALLY capable of “handling the truth.” WOW.

Then there was also the total bs about whether 20% or 40% of all bad stuff/actors would be exposed..... Q said “we listened” (to the clamor of anons? loyal Q-followers??) and decided to up it from 20% to 40%.

20 or 40% of WHAT? counting perps, charges, crimes, prosecutions etc.? Whatever the 20/80 or 40/60 percentages were supposed to represent, it was just SILLY TALK.... i.e., if there were this grand secret movement of “White Hats” at the top level of the US govt, they would not, could not be deciding in Dec. 2017, “let’s see, shall we reveal 20% of all the bad stuff? no, 40%??? ok, done.” That’s just a nonsensical to think or talk about revealing/prosecuting criminal/treasonous actions.

NO ONE, not POTUS Trump or AG Sessions or anyone else, could reasonably sit in a room and decide “well, let’s reveal 20% of the bad stuff to the public” or “let’s reveal 40% of the bad stuff to the public now.”

This is simply total adolescent B.S.

It is not the way any senior official(s) could go about judging how to pursue prosecutions of savage crimes, subversion, treason, etc. You would go after what you can get at and think you should go after... but you would not imagine you could ever have such tight control over the “flow” of exposures, revelations, prosecutions, etc. 20% today, 40% next week.... ok, maybe now the public can handle 60% ????

This is just adolescent crap. One reason I don’t tend to think “Q” is either AI or a “Deep State psyops” campaign (though I continue to affirm that I just don’t follow it all closely enough to reach any firm conclusion).

THen ofc there is all the recent b.s. with Corsi. What a s##tshow!!


1,965 posted on 05/10/2018 4:31:09 PM PDT by Enchante ("Don't believe every bit of crap you read on the internet." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1783 --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1960 | View Replies]

To: corlorde; Fantasywriter
Atencion! Atencion!

Corsie update.

All ignorant Q trolls who have no clue about what is going on. Please read this lengthy article if you have any interest in actually knowing anything. Expand your thinking.

Infowars against Q.

1,966 posted on 05/10/2018 4:33:57 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1963 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
(though I continue to affirm that I just don’t follow it all closely enough to reach any firm conclusion).

You are in no position to form an opinion, based on your own testimony.

Your words are wind.

1,967 posted on 05/10/2018 4:37:08 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1965 | View Replies]

One more reason that the 20/80 or 40/60 percentage talk is simply silly is that it takes no account of the magnitude of crimes or the significance/standing of perps.

I.e., it makes zero sense to weigh revelations of minor crimes or low level figures in the same scales with treason, child trafficking etc. or compare prosecuting some obscure lower bureaucrat with prosecuting a Podesta or (dare we hope) Hillary, Obama, etc.

You can’t just take a percentage of deeds/crimes or perps/DeepStaters and say “this is the percentage we have decided to expose and prosecute.” Silliness.


1,968 posted on 05/10/2018 4:37:20 PM PDT by Enchante ("Don't believe every bit of crap you read on the internet." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1783 --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1965 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
[Sounds racist to me. Is he talking about the Obamas?]

Careful, Fantifa. Your SJW slip is showing.

1,969 posted on 05/10/2018 4:39:11 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1960 | View Replies]

To: bagster

B.s. you have reading comprehension difficulties.

I argue about the things I DO think I have some basis to think, and then I also note places where I do not think there is sufficient evidence to decide something.

THAT is a how a more careful, thoughtful mind would approach these matters.

It is NOT a game to just try to always take a strong stance and bludgeon or ridicule others into submission.

I give examples of actually THINKING about this stuff and not just swallowing/regurgitating.

I am sad that you cannot grasp my method.


1,970 posted on 05/10/2018 4:39:51 PM PDT by Enchante ("Don't believe every bit of crap you read on the internet." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1783 --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1967 | View Replies]

To: corlorde
I've been informed repeatedly that the Qers have got this.

That is correct. In the meantime, sharpen your axe, Babalooey, and leave the thinnin' to us.

Your time of usefulness may come.

1,971 posted on 05/10/2018 4:41:03 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1959 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
Still talking to yourself, sugar britches?

:)

1,972 posted on 05/10/2018 4:43:27 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies]

To: bagster; Fantasywriter

You ripped my words out of context, as you often do. The CONCLUSION of my train of thought in that post was that between options such as (not an exhaustive list) (1) Silly LARP , (2) adolescent MAGA LARP, (3) serious ADULT MAGA LARP, (4) AI program, (5) Deep State psyops etc. etc. I don’t try to take a definite position on THOSE kinds of issues.

That does not mean I didn’t just indicate reasons I don’t take “Q” to be what he pretends to be.

It should not be necessary to spell this kind of thing out in every comment, but you don’t argue in good faith.

We need Fantasy Writer’s fine synopsis of “Q alternatives” — I will have to look that up again.


1,973 posted on 05/10/2018 4:46:22 PM PDT by Enchante ("Don't believe every bit of crap you read on the internet." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1783 --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1967 | View Replies]

It is perfectly possible and REASONABLE to say “here are some reasons I don’t take Q to be what is claimed” and then to FOLLOW that with,

“I don’t know with any certainty WHAT Q really is, I do know what he is not.”

That is the form of my arguments, in informal prose, though some trolls seem to wilfully willingly eagerly try to misunderstand me at every turn.


1,974 posted on 05/10/2018 4:49:41 PM PDT by Enchante ("Don't believe every bit of crap you read on the internet." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1783 --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1973 | View Replies]

To: bagster
All ignorant Q trolls who have no clue about what is going on. Please read this lengthy article if you have any interest in actually knowing anything. Expand your thinking.

You are slipping. I posted that already. Please keep up.

1,975 posted on 05/10/2018 4:50:48 PM PDT by corlorde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1966 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
THAT is a how a more careful, thoughtful mind would approach these matters.

Wrong.

A more careful, thoughtful mind would look at ALL the evidence before forming an opinion. You have formed an opinion without examining the evidence. Very Comey-like, if you ask me.

Ask yourself this question. What have I missed? What has the lesser Oracle seen that I haven't. Why is Bagster, more able to understand things than I am? How can I spout such itnorant opinions while at the same time admitting I haven't looked at the evidence? Am I retarded?

These, and other questions, should keep you awake at night. If you were intellectually honest. I suspect that you are not.

You are hereby debunked and nothing you say on the subject of Q holds water. Dismissed with prejudice.

Bailiff, remove the troll from the courtroom.

1,976 posted on 05/10/2018 4:51:25 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1970 | View Replies]

To: corlorde

+10

I am calm, Q re-assures us all that “We are in control” or something along those lines.


1,977 posted on 05/10/2018 4:51:35 PM PDT by Enchante ("Don't believe every bit of crap you read on the internet." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1783 --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1959 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
I am sad that you cannot grasp my method.

Oh, you have a method.

Never mind, then.

Don't be sad, lil cowpoke.

1,978 posted on 05/10/2018 4:53:04 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1970 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
We need Fantasy Writer’s fine synopsis of “Q alternatives” — I will have to look that up again.

You are in no position to choose from any list of options regarding the authenticity of Q.

You have not examined the evidence and you have been debunked.

You have been hoisted on your own retard, goodman.

And your words are wind.

1,979 posted on 05/10/2018 4:55:39 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1973 | View Replies]

To: corlorde

Well that escalated quickly. Poor Corsi. It looks like he was finally onto something. Q DID more openly swing his support behind the Deep State beginning at least on May 7. So, adios Corsi.


1,980 posted on 05/10/2018 4:57:19 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1963 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,941-1,9601,961-1,9801,981-2,000 ... 2,061-2,068 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson