Q Anon: (5/2/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/2/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Each live stream video remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronym definitions to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[Mazey]

Thank you for those pics. I’ve never seen them.

[huldah1776]

other explanations are programming language, but still get same outcome.

[RitaOK]

Nice! I will try to remember it!

[JockoManning]

Wasn't her BS degree in materials science? It's been a long time since I read her stuff or watched her videos. But I distinctly "remember," I think, something about having expertise in materials science from her univ training.

I understand about the Hutchinson effect. Nevertheless, it appears that SOMETHING atypical occurred on 9/11.

[MHGinTN]

You asserted that there were no steel columns in the center of the towers. This misdirection would support the false notion of pancaking the floors, but too bad for your assertions there were massive central columns in addition to the many exterior columns. THE STEEL OF THESE CENTER COLUMNS were not found in the debris. Do you assert that they were vaporized? Are you aware that pancaking 1oo floors at the speed the towers came down would make a pyroclastic cloud, which was not present in the collapse?

[Swordmaker]

Dr Judy Wood’s assertion is that the succeeding pancaking would take at least some bits of time. That would not be consistent with the towers falling at the speed of a free falling rock.

And I told you it doesn't fall at the speed of a falling rock. That's another lie the tin-foil hat brigade is telling you so they can push their narratives.

I've timed it myself, several times, from the first sign of failure to the final drop, and it is seven seconds longer than a rock dropped from the top would take to fall that distance. That extra time is fully accounted for in calculating the hydraulic cushioning of the air in each successive floor being compressed and then forced out at high speed after being raised to extremely high temperatures, very slightly slowing down the fall AND accounting for the first few floors mechanically resisting the fall before failure. Have you ever rapidly pushed down on a manual tire air pump which had no place for the air to go?

Each hydraulic cushioning as a floor pancaked took progressively less time as the piston of debris got faster and faster with more kinetic energy added by the force of gravity slightly offset by that hydraulic air compression.

Nothing in air falls at the exact speed of acceleration of gravity (there's that lie). . . the counteracting force of air pressure slows it down. In most atmospheric falls the object falling usually does not add mass and eventually reaches a velocity where the counteracting force of air pressure exactly equals the force of gravity. This is called terminal velocity. It is different for every falling object as it is a function of cross-sectional area in the direction of fall, drag, and aerodynamics.

For example, a skydiver, falling flat, with arms and legs spread, terminal velocity before opening his/her parachute is approximately 155 mph, but going head down, arms tucked in, it's about 220 mph. Opening the chute increases the skydiver's cross-sectional area in relation to the fall, and terminal velocity drops drastically to around 10 to 15 mph or less, so he or she can safely get back on the ground.

[MHGinTN]

That does it. You are disingenuous and not to be trusted. You lie about Dr Woods background and try to convince people to ignore her wise counsel on 911, so you are no longer credible. And that is disappointing since I heretofore enjoyed your work at FR.

The main question Dr Woods seeks to have us consider is WHAT happened to the towers. All other questions are secondary to understanding what ... then the who, how, etc can be addressed.

[Enlightened1]

This is good run down on the latest Q posts.

Youtuber, Praying Medic always does a great analysis. I highly recommend him on understanding Q posts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0H589P-BaZM

[Axenolith]

Regardless of the mechanics, which have MANY people pursuing paths that appear promising but don’t ever produce “meat”, we know FOR SURE that there was a cabal in power halls that KNEW what was going down and was prepared financially and legislatively to benefit from it.

Identically, with the Florida shooter. People KNEW that was coming, and were prepared to manipulate the public to satisfy their ends.

There are many more examples.

The events and their mechanics and minutia are essentially irrelevant after the fact. The ONLY thing that matters is WHO KNEW and structured the aftermath for their benefit to the detriment of the Republic and its citizenry.

It looks like we’re on the verge of getting to the bottom of the clique that pulls and manipulates this shit, and i for one am ready for some righteous payback. Payback that is going to shine a little justice for the 100’s of thousands who’s youthful blood has watered this earth to slake the power thirst of these worthless soulless bastards as they played their planetary monopoly game...

[JockoManning]

I counted the fall, too. My count matched Judy Wood’s. I have no explanation for our discrepancy.

[JockoManning]

The main question Dr Woods seeks to have us consider is WHAT happened to the towers. All other questions are secondary to understanding what ... then the who, how, etc can be addressed.

Well & accurately put, imho.

[Axenolith]

Kerry is a douchebag but the last thing I’d give him grief for is legally denying a government tax revenue...

[JockoManning]

The main question Dr Woods seeks to have us consider is WHAT happened to the towers. All other questions are secondary to understanding what ... then the who, how, etc can be addressed.

Also, Dr Woods has taken tons of flack and threats--this was not a wonderful thing for her to do in terms of the responses she got from very powerful people etc. IIRC, she may have even had to resign her job as part of the flack she took. If she'd been more wimpy with a different, lower level of respect for THE TRUTH, we'd have never heard of her.

[JockoManning]

There are many more examples.

The events and their mechanics and minutia are essentially irrelevant after the fact. The ONLY thing that matters is WHO KNEW and structured the aftermath for their benefit to the detriment of the Republic and its citizenry.

It looks like we’re on the verge of getting to the bottom of the clique that pulls and manipulates this shit, and i for one am ready for some righteous payback. Payback that is going to shine a little justice for the 100’s of thousands who’s youthful blood has watered this earth to slake the power thirst of these worthless soulless bastards as they played their planetary monopoly game...

Well and accurately put. Thanks.

[JockoManning]

We like PRAYINGMEDIC, too.

[JockoManning]

I believe that both Dr Woods and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth DID produce much meat.

It's just not as unarguable in some respects as the naysayers demand.

It reminds of of Shrillery ... she always has a different lie, a different explanation, a different excuse, a different 'reality' on a different planet etc. that she insists is the truly true truest truth. LOLOLOLOL.

[Swordmaker]

Are you employed to spin dissonance or just this determined to spread the disinformation fog supported by staged crap? Physics says therer is so far no explanation which fits what happened to the towers. To so arduously spin for one explanation or another is suspect therefore. And if you want me to shut up and get out of your way just let Jim know I am questioning the 911 conventional explanation.

I had a background in PHYSICS as a college major before I switched to Economics. I tutored in Physics in both high school and College. So, no, I am NOT "employed to spin dissonance or just this determined to spread the disinformation fog supported by staged crap?"

I always follow the facts and the science. . . and these tin-foil hat brigade members are POSTING easily checkable lies, such as the time it took for the towers to fall.

I. TIMED. THEM. MYSELF.

You can do it yourself too.

I don't take anyone's word for anything, especially bloggers selling hot air, advertising, and self-published books.

If you want to think that I'm a tool of the establishment, look up the TWA-800 disaster and you will find me prominently present, including what came to be known as Swordmaker's Timeline based on both active and passive radar return data, which proved that only a missile could have brought down that aircraft and that both the CIA's and the NTSB's cartoons were as phony as thirteen dollar bills. . . which is why I still don't trust James Kalstrom. . . who was involved in that cover up. So don't try painting ME with your BLACK TAR BRUSH! It doesn't stick!

I also did the math on the forward momentum of TWA-800 which proved it could NOT HAVE ZOOM CLIMBED and wound up in the ocean where it did. Go look. SHEESH!

I have explained the EXACT PHYSICS of the Twin Towers Fall... and OCCAMS RAZOR FITS. Only these idiots who make UP THEIR FACTS find it doesn't fit, but claiming such lies as the towers "fell in the time a rock falls" have to create new explanations so they can sell their books. But the facts are they did NOT fall in that "rock fall time." They made up that facturd. . . just as they made up another facturd they push claiming that the buildings shouldn't have fallen into their own footprints.

Where ELSE should they have FALLEN? It's gravity. Things fall straight down! The amount of force to cause that much mass to fall anywhere else BUT STRAIGHT DOWN is astronomically huge... and where would that force have come from? On what vector? How was it applied? Magic?

[Swordmaker]

Wasn't her BS degree in materials science? It's been a long time since I read her stuff or watched her videos. But I distinctly "remember," I think, something about having expertise in materials science from her univ training.

Yes, it was. But that's a long way from being an knowledgeable in a field to the extent she's capable of challenging the experts in a field completely divorced from her specialty of Bio-Engineering mechanics. . . which she NO LONGER DOES, not since 2004, when she got herself involved in a fringe "science" of Pseudo-Electro-mechanics, another subject she knew extremely little about.

[JockoManning]

It would be interesting if 10 FREEPERS would watch the youtube videos of the fall and do their own count in seconds.

[JockoManning]

Qx has known BS and BA degreed folks who were much smarter and more accurate to reality than their PhD COLLEAGUES. imhoh, you are as fast and loose with facts about Dr Woods with your negative attitude toward her as you are accusing her of being with the facts of 9/11.