Posted on 04/22/2018 5:32:43 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. Today, only Qanonposts.com is working for me but weeks ago I was advised that it was hacked:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump
I checked it wasn’t Spencer Tracey he was Capt Culpeper it was the police cheif.
Police Chief Aloysius : [to Captain Culpeper] It’s no. The answer is no. He won’t back any increase in pensions. He won’t even talk about it. And there won’t be any increase in pensions. And do you know why? Because they got a solid majority of both Republicans and Democrats who’ve agreed that if anything is said about pensions, they’ll actually reduce your pension! Why? Because they know that you personally were more responsible than anybody else for closing down the houses.
Saw it 1st time in about 1963 when I was 16. Saw it in one of those in-the-round theaters somewhere in LA area. When Jimmy Durante kicked that bucket at the start of the movie I started laughing, didn’t stop laughing till the end. (I’m simple minded suppose)
Good read from Tracy. Thanks for posting.
And thanks for pinging. I was gone over the weekend, but your pings helped me keep up.
Things move so fast here so a ping helps me jump back into the jump rope so to speak.
Aloysius T. McKeever
Huge BOOM! Good job getting it on here!
Q 272
Prayers up, NIKK.
Speedy and full recovery!!
God bless.
Sh*t, I’d settle for a cherry bomb in a toilet today. Something, anything!
CLAS = classified. I like it.
You go to the head of the CLAS!
#Qanon Boards were under attack heavy last night and early this morning. Something big must be getting ready to drop. The clowns know it. It will get out one way or the other. You can't stop us now. pic.twitter.com/cVyhZjFOU2— jaci MAGA (@jackiec57) April 23, 2018
Didn’t the Q message mentioning CLAS also include +3?
Anything to do with the levels? Are these correct?
The U.S. classification of information system has three classification levels — Top Secret, Secret, and Confidential — which are defined in EO 12356.2 Those levels are used both for NSI and atomic energy information (RD and FRD). Section 1.1(a) of EO 12356 states that:
(a) National Security Information (hereinafter “classified information”) shall be classified at one of the following three levels:
(1) “Top Secret” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.
(2) “Secret” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security.
(3) “Confidential” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security.
Roseanne just supposedly tweeted ‘Pi’. As in 3.14 pi.
When was McCabe’ bday again?
Thanks bagster for your kind words. We’ll see how it goes.
That British document showed up about a month ago.
At the time it was debunked. Or possibly “debunked”? They got Steele’s first name wrong and and said he was MI5, but he was MI6.
I am not saying that it’s genuine, but I am not so sure that is enough to debunk it. Here are my reasons:
1. Just because there is a mistake in a document, that doesn’t mean that the document is fake. People make mistakes all the time. I doubt they have editors and fact checkers going over this stuff and fixing all flaws before it goes out.
2. How do we really know that he was MI6 and not MI6? Can you be both? Maybe the MI6 public info is a lie? Who knows? So many lies flying around these days.
3. If the name is not a mistake, how do we know that he doesn’t have an alias or something? Do you really think the last occupant of the WH was named BHO?
My 2 cents’ worth.
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.