Q Anon: (4/20/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 4/20/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. Today, only Qanonposts.com is working for me but weeks ago I was advised that it was hacked:

http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump

[edzo4]

Exabyte zettabyte yottabyte

[little jeremiah]

ThankQ.

In my (always humble...) opinion, there is so much going on behind the scenes that is not being made public, that all of us, even us Q thread habitues, will be amazed when the curtains are pulled back.

[JockoManning]

Sorry. I don’t know the answer to that question. One would think that the DNA in all cells would be identical ... somehow. Beyond my knowledge & awareness, however.

[STARLIT]

Trying to catch up..I have to feed the guys here.

Oooooozing YES!

[JockoManning]

Ahhhh. Thanks. Those sound vaguely familiar.

What has been construed as sufficient to record all the info in the entire Library of Congress?

[little jeremiah]

And this is why people who want good for themselves and others (especially those around them) use good judgment and care about what they take in via the senses; especially eyes and ears. It will affect (or infect!) the mind and intelligence (meaning the part of our consciousness that directs the mind) and thus our speech and actions.

[JockoManning]

In my (always humble...) opinion, there is so much going on behind the scenes that is not being made public, that all of us, even us Q thread habitues, will be amazed when the curtains are pulled back.

I think you're quite right.

[grey_whiskers]

the 188% guy
——::::-———
I totally missed that and to this *day* don’t get the reference!

Some guy picked a fight with bagster, claiming that he (not bagster) could bench press 188% of his body weight.

Bags being who he is, the guy was humorously flamed to a crisp in short order.

[edzo4]

Google says

Twitter “needed just 20 terabytes to back up every tweet that’s ever existed… that’s about twice the estimated size of the print collection of the Library of Congress.” “A TB, or terabyte, is about 1.05 million MB. All the data in the American Library of Congress amounts to 15 TB.”Apr 25, 2012

[xone]

i.e. the expression of this or that gene or set of genes CAN BE AND ROUTINELY IS changed by the internal/external environmental experiences, conditions.

If the above were so, humans would be in a state of perpetual chimerism. Not to mention the goings on vis a vis male zygote production.

[JockoManning]

Some guy picked a fight with bagster, claiming that he (not bagster) could bench press 188% of his body weight.

Bags being who he is, the guy was humorously flamed to a crisp in short order.

Good summary.

[bagster]

Palantir:
Did Q mention Thiel? If so,Palantir could be included wrt Thiel.

With my rudimentary searching skills, I could find no specific mention of Thiel by Q. I do think Palantir was arrived at from the below Q post with the [P] in killbox. What other "Ps" make any sense, given the context? Pope? Putin?

Mess with the best, die like the rest.
[2] highly classified clown ops exposed.
[44] remaining.
Wizards & Warlocks.
Save the best for last.
[P]

The LexiQon has these possibilities listed under "P": P = Putin. Pope Francis. Greeneyes suggests "P" as "So far we have the Pope, Pindar, Pence, Palantir, and Pharaoh."

Of the suggested "P" interpretations listed, which "P" makes the most sense in the context of the above mentioned Q post?

Anyway. I guess it's not that big a deal. Just keep Palantir in mind for future puzzle solving. I'll keep Palantir on my personal watch list. I think it's important.

I will not mention Palantir and LexiQon in the same breath ever again. I just thought it would be useful to list it under possible interpretations of "P" or [P] to keep it handy for future reference.

Sorry to make such a big deal about it. Let's move on. :)

[grey_whiskers]

You read the quote too quickly. It is not the genes which are changed (that is, the DNA backbone) but the *expression* of the genes, (are they turned *on* to produce proteins or turned *off* so they don’t direct anything)?

[crosdaddy]

People can’t bench more than they weigh??? Really?

[JockoManning]

Thanks. Interesting.

[txhurl]

Going after AlGore is a hoot. Means DiCaprio will be wearing a boot soon too.

[JockoManning]

I'd think that would depend on

1. How much change was involved and

2. What type of change(s) were involved.

[grey_whiskers]

It was context-dependent, the poster came across as a real blowhard.

For the nonce, I once read that Madeleine Not-Too-Bright could do a 1,000-lb leg press (you know, on a machine where the weights are pushed up a 45-degree incline).

Possible, but ...I tend to doubt it.

[AZLiberty]

I love yoga. What could be better than exercising in a sea of half-dressed 20-year-old women?

Of course the management now requires me to wear blinders.

[RitaOK]

<< (Bartilomo—) “ ... so was Hillary pulling the strings at state and launched an investigation on her political opponent” Nunes answered “ can’t say yet” and the other was “what kind of problems for Comey, similar to McCabe criminal charges?” Nunes answered “hard to say right now”. “ >>>>

What do you want to bet that getting those answers rely on turning a few bad actors, and doing so with some more solid comm evidence?

For example, did you hear Nunes discuss Comey’s leak to his pal the professor? Where Nunes said (I couldn’t believe he said it) that he believes that Comey passed out his leaky memos to “others”, besides only the campus comedian?

Nunes has got some goods, or he would not have made such an assertion with such a relaxed expression on his face, do you think?