Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: reformedliberal

I prefer the Oxford comma.

I was watching the trial and I saw two perverts, 0vomit, and Hitlery.

I was watching the trial and I saw two perverts, 0vomit and Hitlery.

In the first case I am discussing 4 people. In the second case only 2.


1,004 posted on 04/11/2018 7:27:12 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 990 | View Replies ]


To: generally
In the first case I am discussing 4 people. In the second case only 2.

That is why I, also, prefer the Oxford comma.

1,063 posted on 04/11/2018 8:11:43 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Kill: google,TWITTER,FACEBOOK,WaPo,Hollywd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antifa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1004 | View Replies ]

To: generally

I like the second choice.


1,158 posted on 04/11/2018 9:11:01 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1004 | View Replies ]

To: generally

I was watching the trial and I saw two perverts, 0vomit, and Hitlery.

I was watching the trial and I saw two perverts, 0vomit and Hitlery.

In the first case I am discussing 4 people. In the second case only 2.
_________________________________

Ovomit and Hitlery, those perverts, were at the trial.

Those perverts, Ovomit and Hitlery, were on trial.

I watched those perverts, Ovomit and Hitlery, at the trial.

I was watching the trial of those perverts, Ovomit and Hitlery.

I was watching the trial and I saw those perverts: Ovomit and Hitlery.

My readers can count. 2 people are listed. The insertion of *two* is unnecessary and one of 2 reasons I see for the Oxford comma in your fun exercise. The other reason is the non-specific *the*. Using *those*, instead of *the*, increases specificity, ruling out confusion over the number of perverts.

My habit of leaving out the *and* (& Oxford comma) is mostly for lists of 3 or more(from WIP):

“Histories, novels, films, some authentic, some romanticized, others pure lying garbage,abound on every human world.”

“...the strongest, the cleverest, the most ruthless rose to power.”

I do utilize the Oxford comma and the conjunction when needed for clarity. If the sentence is clear, I leave out the comma preceding the conjunction. I will re-write for clarity. I recognize that I tend toward overly-long lists. I had to go through 8 pages in 12-point to find the examples, so I do attempt *accepted* usage. Sometimes the choices are a question of voice.

Fun with editing! Nerd mode off.

Thanks, g. I’ve neglected my own work since this thread began. You made me pull it up for examples. I did find Oxford commas, as well as clear sentences that left it out. Still feel rebellious about Oxford, though. It’s visceral.


1,389 posted on 04/12/2018 5:29:32 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1004 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Eats, shoots and leaves.

This book is for you.
https://www.amazon.com/Eats-Shoots-Leaves-Tolerance-Punctuation/dp/1592402038/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1523567049&sr=8-1&keywords=eats+shoots+and+leaves&dpID=51zqw6cX7ZL&preST=_SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_&dpSrc=srch


1,707 posted on 04/12/2018 2:03:41 PM PDT by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1004 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson