Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
It means ports in what would become Union states were paying a lot more tariffs than those that would be Confederate.

I’m looking for the specific tariff acts, who passes and signed them, and how they unfairly targeted southern states that would precipitate secession. I doubt you’ll be able to.

84 posted on 04/09/2018 12:51:01 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie; DiogenesLamp
Here is how one prominent Virginia author saw the question in a novel in 1836:

The Partisan Leader.

85 posted on 04/09/2018 12:55:10 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal Pubbie
It means ports in what would become Union states were paying a lot more tariffs than those that would be Confederate.

That's what it looks like, doesn't it? :)

Obviously the North was producing the vast majority of that wealth represented by those tariff collections, wouldn't you think?

I’m looking for the specific tariff acts, who passes and signed them, and how they unfairly targeted southern states that would precipitate secession.

You can start there, but that's not the important part of the story. Find out the value of Northern export Products to Europe. That's a better place to start.

I doubt you’ll be able to.

I think you are going to get surprised.

87 posted on 04/09/2018 2:48:09 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson