Q Anon: (4/4/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 4/4/2018 | Vanity, FReepers

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump

[fatima]

I’ll poke around to see what I can find.

[bitt]

p

[No_Doll_i]

We are nearing the target. They are losing their minds at an increasing rate. These people are insane!

LOL - Q makes the NYT

[bitt]

pinging ransomnote’s list for new Q

#2040

[txhurl]

Strac6?

[Cboldt]

-- It is my understanding that POTUS cannot be indicted, must be impeached and removed first. (?) --

Pretty much an academic point, really. Consider if there was enough evidence of a state crime, like murder, and indictment by a state DA. All sorts of possibilities.

Generally figured that for federal offenses, there would not be an indictment - but if the allegations were serious enough, the order of procedure would be irrelevant for practical purposes.

If Mueller finds something he thinks is criminal, he will not indict, and it is contrary to DOJ rules that he even apprise the public of such a finding.

[generally]

Q 1041 posted at 11:50.

[RoosterRedux]

Here's an older pic of the island which show an entirely different set of roads. Note, no phallic symbol.

[generally]

+ Soros
++ Rothschilds
+++ Saudi Arabia

[SERKIT]

Would you believe they called the WH for comment prior to publishing?

I hope it was a two-word answer, and I don't mean "No Comment"....the two words start with an "F" and a "Y".....or... "For Q".

[Duchess47]

Thank you.

[Cboldt]

Anon observes ...

They know they called the White House for comment and now Q has posted that.

They know a White House insider is posting as Q because only THEY know they called for comment!

[RitaOK]

I prefer your inference, since it was practically Star Wars imaging being played out last night, on one i-net radio channels last night.

[txhurl]

Taking that deep state bunker out may cause the resistance to surrender.

[No_Doll_i]

I just read that. I LOVE the smell of desperation on a Friday afternoon.

Someone should write a song!

[STARLIT]

Sorry I'm finally back..I had to take time out and try to red pill someone. It was like an experiment because it will let me see what I need to work on. LOL She said she wasn't shocked or think I am crazy. Not sure she believes everything. But to me that's ok. She'll now question and think more about the world around her.

You did a good job Peabody. I have nothing to add as of now.

[yawningotter]

We know what the 4 AM talking points were about today. Hasn’t this already been addressed in several Q drops?

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Bkmk

[No_Doll_i]

Too bad there is not a comments section on that article, it would be priceless!

[reformedliberal]

don’t think the population of the island would require a large sewage systems. Septic systems would be sufficient.
______________________

Small islands (larger and w/more populace than Epstein’s) in the Caribbean technically use cesspits. The geology is not conducive to a septic field as we have them here. I know that on Bonaire, for example, the cesspits were pumped regularly and the effluent sprayed into caves at/below the waterline (In a Marine Park, no less). Then, the Netherlands set up a treatment plant....can’t recall when. Last 18 years or so, perhaps.

Epstein _could_ have a small treatment plant. He has a lot of visitors there.

Would a state-of-the-art private treatment plant stink? My system is a 1300-gallon double tank/pump set up with a large sanitary field. (my business uses a lot of water.) Pumped every 3 years, but the specs I’ve seen say that for 2 people, 7 years is the capacity (do the math...he’d need on-site pumpers used more often). Again, I use and dispose of a lot of water, most of it containing exhausted dye residue.

Even right around the main tank, there is no odor as long as the cap is in place. Field is well-constructed with no ponding or odor.