Well, I spent the evening watching British gardening shows and sitting by the fire with my wife and my Beagles. Nice evening, and I missed all of this!
I'll catch up and see all of your comments. My first thoughts:
- Bolton is going to be taking down some Deep State Obama tics that have embedded themselves in the flesh of government at the NSC and elsewhere, and serious crimes and treason is going to be exposed (streets will not safe for them)
- IG report finally coming out in April, Sessions will go on the offensive, and Rat Rosenstein is in some serious trouble (the Pakistan IT scandal with DWS, Uranium 1, Dirty Mueller, Vote Fraud, and Iran (treason). As I recall, Rosenstein signed off on 2 of the FISA warrants to spy on Trump - and Rosenstein KNEW the "evidence" behind the "justification" was a sham.
- Can't wait for this one:
Everything has meaning.
[A]wan.
Tarmac.
What does the [A] mean? I think the Anons on 4 and 8 Chan said there is a cell phone recording of the Tarmac meeting with BJ Clinton and Loretta Lynch, with possibly Hillary on the phone.
- More trouble for Google, Twitter, Facebook, and the rest of them
- U.S. Attorney Huber is going to be the teeth of the dragon that is the IG report. Jonathan Turley (liberal but very honest liberal) knows what is going on, and is going on the media to say so
Pray for the President. Pray for Israel.
According to judicial watch there was a FOIA request for the recordings of the tarmac meeting which was denied.
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/nsa-blocks-release-loretta-lynch-bill-clinton-airplane-tape-national-security/
Kawa’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the NSA was denied, citing national security, but the NSA did not deny that the tape exists.
“To respond to your request, NSA would have to confirm or deny the existence of intelligence records on Loretta Lynch,” the agency stated in its FOIA response on November 14, days after the election. “Were we to do so in your case, we would have to do so for every other requester. This would enable, for example, a terrorist or other adversary to file a FOIA request with us in order to determine whether he or she was under surveillance or had evaded it. This is turn would allow that individual to better assess whether they could successfully act to damage the national security of the United States. For such reasons, we can neither confirm nor deny the existence or non-existence of the records you requested.”
https://americansecuritytoday.com/recording-clinton-lynch-tarmac-meeting/
Kawa stated that “the Defense Informations Systems Agency manages the monitoring of telephonic devices and electronic communication systems a board the airplane of certain government officials including the Attorney General, who is required to use a government issued plane for all travel both personal and business.”
Kawa has filed a FOIA request with several government agencies including the FBI, which can be found here.
The FOIA law allows for expedited processing in under 10 days in “unusual circumstances” consistent with those described above regarding the need for immediate public disclosure of government related business.
Kawa states, “In conclusion, it was statutorily required for Loretta Lynch to be on a government plane, which she was on June 27, 2016 when she met with President Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Phoenix.”
“The Tempest Emanations program through the NSA and NATO monitored the telephonic and computer devices on that plane through the VOSIP component of CommSec (Communications Security).
“Data captured would have included audio and video through the plans telephonic, computer, and other electronic devices. Such information would be captured and stored by the NSA and it should be publicly available through FOIA.”
https://www.wired.com/2008/04/nsa-releases-se/
Far across the lab, a freestanding oscilloscope had developed a habit of spiking every time the teletype encrypted a letter. Upon closer inspection, the spikes could actually be translated into the plain message the machine was processing. Though he likely didn’t know it at the time, the engineer had just discovered that all information processing machines send their secrets into the electromagnetic ether.
Call it a TEMPEST in a teletype.
This story of how the United States first learned about the fundamental security vulnerability called “compromising emanations” is revealed for the first time in a newly-declassified 1972 paper TEMPEST: A Signal Problem (.pdf), from the National Security Agency’s secret in-house journal Cryptologic Spectrum.
“There has always been speculation about TEMPEST coming out of the Cold War period,” says Joel McNamara, author of Secrets of Computer Espionage: Tactics and Countermeasures, who maintained for years the best compilation of public information on TEMPEST. “But the 1943 Bell Labs discovery is roughly ten years earlier than I would have expected.”
The unnamed Bell Telephone technician was the Alexander Graham Bell of a new, secret science, in which electronic eavesdroppers – as far away as hundreds of feet from their target tune into radio waves leaking from electronic equipment to steal secrets.
Building on the breakthrough, the U.S. developed and refined the science in an attempt to spy on the Soviets during the Cold War. And it issued strict standards for shielding sensitive buildings and equipment. Those rules are now known to government agencies and defense contractors as TEMPEST, and they apply to everything from computer monitors to encrypted cell phones that handle classified information.