But if rebooting is just normal, SOP, then why would Q mention it?
I guess this covers their bases if they decide to go after Obama???
Like I said, if they decided to go after Obama they would need to delegitimize his presidency from the very beginning. People do not fight for someone they feel has been proven a dupe. Thus might calm down any rioting. The other way it could be used would be for the defendants to prove Obama was not legit and thus the investigation was not legit with an Obama appointee???
As much as I would like to see it, I still have a hard time believing that any ex-president will ever be charged with anything just for the fact it might destabilize the US.
A very excellent point.
We need to focus on one aspect of this. Either the reboot points us to the individual (Huber) or the fact that he was appointed in the first place. Or both? I think more so the appo;tnment rather than the individual. And it's almost self-explanatory, isn't it? So why the mention. My head hurts.
You have FReepMail...
OK. Here’s the deal. Those Attorneys that didn’t already resign, at a certain point Trump told all 46 remaining holdovers to submit resignations. One of them -a jerk- refused and was fired (not Huber). LSM firestorm.
Clinton order all to resign the minute he took office-not a peep for LSM.
It is not unusual in the business world, to require all employees at an acquired company to submit resumes for management to determine whether to retain or cut that person.
That would be a “reboot” of the labor force - may the best man win.