[bagster]

Supposition - found out he was a good man, so re-hired him?

A very excellent point.

We need to focus on one aspect of this. Either the reboot points us to the individual (Huber) or the fact that he was appointed in the first place. Or both? I think more so the appo;tnment rather than the individual. And it's almost self-explanatory, isn't it? So why the mention. My head hurts.

[Cboldt]

Huber was one of a score or so US Attorney in the same boat as being named "interim" in March, and subsequently nominations, confirmed and appointed by Trump.

I think the notion of a reboot because Obama is going to be shown unqualified is reasonable, "for the history books." A US Attorney reaching the level of "for the history books" on account of being held over or renominated is not a significant historical event.