Posted on 03/28/2018 7:15:36 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump
On January 21, 2009, Clinton was confirmed in the full Senate by a vote of 942.[319] Clinton took the oath of office of Secretary of State, resigning from the Senate later that day.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
I'm thinking I should too.
and I need another cup of coffee. Thanks
With that thought millions would at least benefit.
bad for liver...
BTW, I think the usage of Gregorian day.month.year format (with dots) is common in the UK and Gregorian month.day.year is the common U.S. usage (I stress, "I think").
That would mean Q intended the date to be communicated as Feb. 12th, 2009 (I think;-).
Sorry, for the repost, I should have looked further down the thread.
Military would make it 2 December 2009! so .... Thoughts?
January 21, 2009 was well before 2 Dec, 2009.
That’s another reason why I think Dr. Gorka is part of the Q team...he probably instinctively uses euro formats for dates, etc.
I’m curious as to how the troll has a screen name of “Basket of Deplorables” with a sign up date in 2014. None of us had heard that term until October 2016.
Good point.
Good point. Very curious. Also went right for the snipe even though she/he had not been subjected to any abuse yet.
The records also highlight a blind spot in the ethics deal the Clintons and the Obama transition team hammered out in 2008 with the involvement of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: While the pact subjected Bill Clintons moneymaking activities to official review, it imposed no vetting on donations to the Clinton Foundation by individuals or private companies in the U.S. or abroad.
Concerns about individuals seeking influence by dropping money in both buckets arose soon after the first few Bill Clinton speech proposals landed at Foggy Bottom. In a 2009 memo greenlighting those talks, a State Department ethics official specifically asked about possible links between President Clintons speaking engagements and donations to the Clinton Foundation. However, the released documents show no evidence that the question was addressed.
NIKK-It was known then about Bill’s speech and money to the Foundation...perhaps this.
OR THIS..Senator Collins of Maine questions Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about the Administration’s Afghanistan plan at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, December 2, 2009
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eiT1sIda7A
THE LIST GOES ON!
Oh noes...it’s Hillary.
I think the plane crash seems more likely to be the really bad thing Q was talking about
:-) Sorry if I seemed cross, I was just tired and focused on reading stuff and got a little annoyed. No Worries, it’s all good.
I have been over on the Q! I think Q is going to have to be a bit more specific about HRC. I mean my God, that woman has been a very busy evil doer!
*Q cited a Michael Doran piece in NR*
LoL That’s what I was reading when I told everyone to knock off the foodie talk, and yes I did read the whole thing. The guy could have knocked it down to about 1/3 and gotten the point across.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.