Q Anon: (3/24/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/24/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

The following Youtube group goes live when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. Their live video remains active as long as they have new insights, information or guests to offer.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts?page=19#19

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted; you can send the president an email message. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump

[txhurl]

PDJT has set a trap/Daniels is (cough) working (ahem) undercover ?

---

That’s my half-theory and I’m about to start stickin’ to it.

[Diogenesis]

Why not a story on 60 Minutes about how smart
and clever HRC was to have actually made a LOT
of money while being SOS? That is true creativity.
Just like the bathroom IPO.

[StormFlag]

I’m not hearing anything about Trump’s statement about the wall from anyone in the media or even talk radio. Has anyone heard anything regarding it yet?

---

It was discussed on Fox and Friends this morning. They mentioned his tweet about it and were wondering out loud if it means that he will use military funding for it, as I recall.

[defconw]

LOL, not sure Bannon would have the patience with us Dumbo's. :) But I read a post last night that had this:

AS[187]. Scalia was murdered. I wish I had the anon skills. I would ask about Andrew was he 187?

[STARLIT]

I think there’s more to it. Our President is also telling the world he is standing by May’s side on this issue. Interesting because I thought she was a puppet for the Globalist.

[defconw]

She is, but....lets play a game.... 5 eyes.

[STARLIT]

Yes, good point.

[EMI_Guy]

Rush is on it right now.

Sounds like he may have show prepped (a little) from here.

[defconw]

Do tell! I am at my clients house, I can’t listen to Rush today.

[Kalam]

I’m not sure you realize you are asking me to accept an account about Reagan’s choosing Bush 1 from “THE NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE.” One that was written the year 2000 for whatever nefarious purpose the Times might have had at the time.

Not only that but from within the article itself I read the line,”George Bush was picked at the very last moment and largely by a combination of chance and some behind-the-scenes maneuvering.”

I don’t know with absolute certainty that there was more maneuvering than what the article states but at the time there were other unanswered questions.A big one was about how Bush 1 was even considered as a candidate for the top job. Then the question about how someone so opposite to Reagan would be considered as the “number 2” in front of other capable and less oppositional options. A consensus at the time was that the choice was made for Reagan by party big wigs.

So did Bush 1 actually feign acceptance so he could become vice pres? Were there other power brokers saying what would or would not happen? (By the way I never liked Kissinger either.) I would suggest that those are some of the other behind the scene maneuverings the article didn’t mention.

No, I still think there was something rotten in Denmark and the idea of A LAST MINUTE CHANCE smells really fishy.

[bitt]

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/03/12/farrakhans-latest-defender-obama-gatekeeper-valerie-jarrett-n2459434?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=

[STARLIT]

I have thought for quite a while..Flynn is one along with others around the world.(military)

[STARLIT]

Sorry, just learning names here.

[Lady Heron]

You did not move up in EDS unless you were willing to move....it wouldn’t have been the last move.

[MayflowerMadam]

Free Republic is the closest thing to social media I’m involved in. I’d LOVE to have it get out that the Parkland brats are being investigated re their invoolvement. But since I din’t do FB or Twitter, it’ll have to be somebody else.

also, it’s very unlikely that Hogg isn’t a Parkland brat, but a 25-year-old plant. His daddy and Podesta in cahoots?

[defconw]

I still think it’s a group. So it could be all of them. But it’s definitely someone in close. Because when the anons have asked for confirmation. POTUS tweets. So it’s someone with clearance and very close to POTUS, Often Q uses the same verbiage as POTUS.

[StormFlag]

Boom? Interesting. I have half thought about Gorka being Q. lol

---

I’ve had the same thought. But wouldn’t someone posting such information be violating security clearance restrictions?

[STARLIT]

I’m with you. Our President is comfortable around military..(Possibly because of his early years in military school). The pictures in Japan and elsewhere leads me to believe there are others around the world and quite possibly using the Q post for other purposes too.

[defconw]

I don’t know. I know HRC and Odumbo broke every law there is so, who’s to say. If say a special state of war exists....