Posted on 03/24/2018 10:04:41 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
The following Youtube group goes live when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. Their live video remains active as long as they have new insights, information or guests to offer.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts?page=19#19
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted; you can send the president an email message. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump
The notion that Trump would interpret the Omnibus Appropriations and other Acts so that funds for building the wall, in excess of the approx 1.6 billion appropriated (use of DoD, etc.) was at least a passing subject of Fox 'n' Friends this morning. I think Steve Ducey brought it up.
I generally don't watch the news unless something is breaking, and my catch of this was pure coincidence as I was tasked with "letting the dogs back in the house," which happens to be nearby a teevee I am not usually nearby.
The general tenor of the back and forth was "What do you think of this idea?" sort of thing. No definite assertion.
“What do you think of this idea?”
That’s why there need to be WallCams at all the sites, with Help Wanted signs peppering the scenes.
[By the way the boomer generation might have given us hippies]
The rest of us BOOMERS are red, white, and blue patriots. Radical hippies of the 60s may try to bring down our nation, but we patriots are rising up!
ph
The rule passed this week in larger rules package, any such amendment that would target an employee or program would have to be passed by a majority of the House and Senate. That makes it unlikely, albeit possible, for lawmakers to reduce a federal workers pay.Many don't even deserve $1.00.
GOP revives rule allowing $1 salaries for government employees https://t.co/o8JfPBswe8— Lisa Mei Crowley (@LisaMei62) March 26, 2018
Democrats and federal employees who worry about how President-elect Donald Trump could use it blasted the rule.
This is part of a very chilling theme that federal workers are seeing right now, Maureen Gilman, the legislative director for the National Treasury Employees Union, told the Post.
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) told reporters this week that the Holman Rule gives Congress a chance to change how government works, something voters asked for when they voted for Trump.
This is a big rule change inside there that allows people to get at places they hadnt before, he told reporters.
The new rule follows requests by the Trump transition team for lists of the names of employees involved in specific programs, such as Energy Department scientists who have worked on climate change.
Sorry..I forgot not every is able to open twitter feed.
Where are you Bagster?
...You people DO KNOW Ross Perot is the reason we have the Clintons!
______________________________________________________________________
I would liked to have had more time to respond and reply but I’m going to be signing out again soon. Anyway, “Do you remember that President Reagan was forced to take Bush 1 as his running mate?” Perot had nothing to do with that. “Do you remember that Bush 1 was ex-director of CIA?” Perot had nothing to do with that. “Do you ‘know’ whether or not elections were rigged back then?” Perot wasn’t the only political intrigue going on at the time. As Iv’e said at other times, “I could not bring myself to vote for Bush 1 because of his connection to the CIA.
My suspicions of that day and time have only been reinforced. Even if Perot had won that election, (Who can really say he didn’t, as I have read elsewhere, its the one who gets to count the votes that wins.) We could still be in the same place today regardless of who was elected.
Some cynicism? Yes. Is man in control? No.
......Instead, on todays Morning Joe, Scarborough expressed surprising skepticism. Scarborough said that instead of being interested in truth, justice, and the American Way, it looked like Daniels is simply out for:
a really big, fat paycheck for her from some publication.
My brother being a Nam Vet. (flew planes...off the subject..LOL) didn't fall for the sham. He figured they were going to give others their pass ports. Once in New York they were told they weren't needed in the US. He and the others did get a BIG settlement thankfully.
470
lot of crazy talk seeping into this thread.. :)
as to Angela Merkel, ‘To me, the only thing that really matters is that she is a globalist’
bump
to
get
camera hogg off my screen page
I thought one of the most significant points was #12.
(12) Desert Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom Phase I were televised, from the buildup to the conclusion.
Trump and our non-dithering allies won’t put on a show.
Also TW has a new post which says:
(1) I think I’ve found the way that Trump can use a presidential executive order (EO) to get rid of ObamaCare.
Thank this man.
with a pic of John Roberts.
Wow and Wow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.