Skip to comments.Q Anon: (3/16/18) Continued from Tuesday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration
Posted on 03/16/2018 7:38:19 PM PDT by ransomnote
This is a shout out to all the Anons who have worked so hard for months on the Q boards to bake Q's drops for us. THANQ, Anons!.
The Q team doesn't like it when they receive praise, but hey, they don't have time to read websites (FR) and besides, they can't stop me!
It just needed to be said.
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639029/posts?page=23#23
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
ThankQ, goodman. Have a bonnie time.
Continuing with my shallow-hole investigations of some of the Hollywood stars, I decided to look at Brook Shields. She is the proper bloodline for power elites to work through her - willing or not - and they did.
Many here may remember her appearance on that genealogy show in which it was shown that she is a direct descendant of Charlemagne.
Article about the show:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
This Washington Post article cites that ancestor and more ..then immediately begins to pooh pooh the significance, in that ALL of us have a good chance of being descended from some kind of royalty or the other. I have not studied that, and cannot with any authority comment on the veracity of the statement, but it certainly seems as though her publicist may have had a hand in the story! We cant be having her adoring fans think that she is above them - Or it could be that genealogy research business publicists advertising in the paper are getting a nod and this is a way to induce people to buy the services so they too can find the genealogical mother lode. [Has Texokie become cynical, or what?]
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
This is from fame chain - and actually could be a useful link to finding the background names of others of Q interest. It lists immediate family members.
~ ~ ~ ~
This gem from NBC had the following statement where we find the Muslim angle. They are making the argument that ALL European royalty are kin to Mohammad.... and yet not proved.... just speculated on and hoped for, near as I can judge:
The longer ago somebody lived, the more descendants a person is likely to have today. Humphrys estimates [ESTIMATES!!! - emphasis texokie] that Muhammad, the founder of Islam, appears on the family tree of every person in the Western world. [Maybe, maybe not?]
Some people have actually tried to establish a documented line between Muhammad, who was born in the 6th century, and the medieval English monarchs, and thus to most if not all people of European descent. Nobody has succeeded yet, but one proposed lineage comes close. Though it runs through several strongly suspicious individuals, the line illustrates how lines of descent can wander down through the centuries, connecting famous figures of the past to most of the people living today.
The proposed genealogy runs through Muhammads daughter Fatima. Her husband Ali, also a cousin of Muhammad, is considered by Shiite Muslims the legitimate heir to leadership of Islam .
I had thought try to find immediate socio/political influences on Sheilds, and they are certainly there, but what Ive been finding fascinating is the reaction in the news to the news of her elevated blood line.
~ ~ ~ ~
From the Wikipedia article about her, it appears that she escaped the abortionist knife and was raised a Catholic.
There was extensive litigation regarding nude pictures taken of her at age 10 with her mothers permission.
From 1981 to 1983, Shields, her mother, photographer Garry Gross, and Playboy Press were involved in litigation in the New York City Courts over the rights to photographs her mother had signed away to Gross (when dealing with models who are minors, a parent or legal guardian must sign such a release form while other agreements are subject to negotiation). Gross was the photographer of a controversial set of nude images taken in 1975 of a then ten-year-old Brooke Shields with the consent of her mother, Teri Shields, for the Playboy Press publication Sugar ‘n’ Spice. The images portray Shields nude, standing and sitting in a bathtub, wearing makeup and covered in oil. The courts ruled in favor of the photographer due to a strange twist in New York law. It would have been otherwise had Brooke Shields been considered a child “performer” rather than a model .
She also spoke at Michael Jacksons funeral. I can understand why she had kinship with him in that they were both exploited shamelessly as children. [JMHO - Texokie]
On July 7, 2009, Shields spoke at the memorial service for Michael Jackson. She stated in that speech that she first met Jackson, who was 21 at the time, when she was 13 years old, and the two instantly became friends. Shields said:
Thinking back to when we met and the many times that we spent together and whenever we were out together, there would be a caption of some kind, and the caption usually said something like ‘an odd couple’ or ‘an unlikely pair,’ but to us it was the most natural and easiest of friendships... Michael always knew he could count on me to support him or be his date and that we would have fun no matter where we were. We had a bond... Both of us needed to be adults very early, but when we were together, we were two little kids having fun.
She seems to have a dichotomy of interests. On the one hand, she has adopted the animal rights cause, and is/was a vegan, yet has also been part of a controversial business, if you are an animal rights proponent:
Shields is also a well-known vegan and an animal rights activist. However, despite coming out against the fur industry in 1989, Shields later went on to create her own mink fur coat at Kopenhagen Fur. She came under the scrutiny of animal rights organizations such as PETA for this visit, which prompted media attention.
In my mind, the story of Brook Shields is one that makes me extremely grateful that it is way above my pay grade to judge. She was a child who escaped the abortionists knife, has been the object of personal space invasion - at least on the part of photographers, if no one else. She was involved as a minor in a lot of well known sexually freighted ads and movies which stirred controversy at the time. She has sought, I think to be open and honest about her experiences.
I wish her well, and hope that her early faith is working its way in her life and the Lord is helping her to find ways to heal and serve others.
One should never try to mix deep state politics and college basketball.
>> $20Tril in swamp assets
That would be great if that is where it is applied. Then China would have no edge on us for buying our debt. It could be why President Trump has turned the tables on them as far as trade goes. Good stuff if this is happening.
New Q post, #953
Comey will project sanctimony to his talk-show sycophants. Hannity is trying to project evidence-based conclusions.
Which is the less-complicated for couch potatoes to absorb?
Supposedly Q is a small team, though seemingly with a single dominant voice. But I don’t see why you’d think young? Seems too knowledgeable for that.
Check out Joe Bastardi at Weatherbell Analytics. He explains a lot of weather by showing historic weather maps.
We’ll see over time. Confidence can be manipulated, as well. We’re good now, only so long as Trump is made safe and if even half of Q is true.
If Trump were to,... just sayin’ here... to lose, for example, or be somehow neutralized in office, I believe he will, in whatever condition or situation, become our “Braveheart”.
IDEAS and self-preservation swerve people into action, no matter who, or what may come. Good guys in high places are finally trickling forward, possibly.
Sadly, the same goes for the dark forces. Patriots need to prepare to stay on the wall.
These people are not going to stop, and Obama promised, at the Greek pillars acceptance speech, a “new army” was on the ground and to “fundamentally change America”.
ISIS, foreign refugees, BLM, ANTIFA, M13, South America and globalist Canada, and the Vatican, are the Pincer Movement to squeeze us, institutionally as well as door to door.
Nothing has been cleaned out, least of all public ed and Academia. The clock is running and retirees who know what is going on are mostly musing over a parlor game.
Have you seen the general public lately?
The last thing the want to do is wake up.
When CINC, on the campaign trail, said he was gonna ‘negotiate down’ our debt, who among us saw his EO coming to seize enough to RETIRE IT? Man’s a genius.
Why do I think young? Well have I gotten the Anon and Q actors combined in my head? Am I misleading myself? Who started the red pill thing?
Umm The Matrix?
I meant Q or Anon! Smarty pants! :)
...McCabes prospects are good.
I don’t buy the pension plea by McCabe, but for any other reason than begging for a signal from his IG and Office of Perfect People, to name his poison and reveal it.
He wanted to know what was coming, in the way of an indictment. He got the read. That is why he had that lengthy prepared statement ready to go, too immediately after his firing. He knew.
And, he knows he will be indicted, unless the dark forces can regain their footing. (Fool.) He chose to dig in and double down, using the media arguments in his temper tantrum tome, against meanie Trump and wicked vengeance and political plotting against him. Boo Hoo.
Why would McCabe dig in, if he thought all was finally lost? He seems to think “they” can take down Trump. Eric Holder is flogging for a civil war.
Mueller indicting Comey (hahahahah) wouldn’t help elect pro-Trump actors into Congress. It would energize the DEMs.
What doesn’t energize the progs? All their dials peg at 15-20, no matter what the subject.
1) Never vote for a prog, no matter how rational they may present.
2) Work in the primaries to set up a patriotic conservative on the GOP side, but honestly? No way around voting R in the general. Yeah, I’m sick of lesser of 2 evils, too. But lesser is lesser.
I’m working my way thru that SES video. Disheartening. Yet another example of how our government has become a sham.
I think the contract between people and government was broken in 1963. It’s gotten worse and worse since then. We need to be seeding Congress with trustworthy Reps and Senators, support Trump for 2020 and make sure we choose as wisely in 2024.
A lot of us geezers, me included, might not make it to 2024. You younger folks are going to have to carry the ball.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.