Q Anon: (3/16/18) Continued from Tuesday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/16/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This is a shout out to all the Anons who have worked so hard for months on the Q boards to bake Q's drops for us. THANQ, Anons!.

The Q team doesn't like it when they receive praise, but hey, they don't have time to read websites (FR) and besides, they can't stop me!

THANQ, Q!!!!
It just needed to be said.

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3639519/posts

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639029/posts?page=23#23

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

[Bigg Red]

Thanks for posting that link. I love Gorka.

[hoosiermama]

You may be correct Some relative
Just a thought. Do The federal marshals take orders from CinC. ? Can marines be sworn in as part of this team?

[little jeremiah]

Lack of evidence; so who knows.

[Bigg Red]

PS: shambolic — I learned a new word. Yay. :)

[RoosterRedux]

What must we LEGALLY demonstrate in order to gain such warrants?

FISA?

Do we TRUST the FISA judges?

MIL INTEL?

State Secrets?

Why is this relevant?

Who can we TRUST?

Expand your thinking.

Q

Well, when Obama wanted to go around FISA, he used MI6.

[Cboldt]

-- US citizens can be classified as Enemy Combatants. --

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), settled that. Yes, they can. But Hamdi was taken from battle in Afghanistan.

I don't recall the set of cases for a US citizen enemy combatant taken in the US. IIRC, that one was kept out of SCOTUS by shifting the defendant to civilian court before SCOTUS heard arguments.

For the hypothetical set of cases involving the attempted coup against the results of the election, I think using the civilian courts is a better approach. No need to hide evidence, the action wasn;t strictly a military/force of violence action, etc. Taking it to military courts would insert a substantial issue to object to.

[little jeremiah]

@TACenters

Replying to @SebGorka
The real Yuri just showed us who he was. I fought the cold war as an Intel Marine, we’ve been looking for you Brennan, thanks.

Wow, what does he mean?? Anyone?

[little jeremiah]

Fantastic. Looks as though Brennan is definitely in the cross hairs.

[WildHighlander57]

Many thanks for posting this, nikk !

Ping to this info by Lisa Mei Crowley:

“looks like Hussein has a busy week ahead”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3640290/posts?page=1325#1325

[Cboldt]

-- US citizens can be classified as Enemy Combatants. --

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), settled that. Yes, they can. But Hamdi was taken from battle in Afghanistan.

I don't recall the set of cases for a US citizen enemy combatant taken in the US. IIRC, that one was kept out of SCOTUS by shifting the defendant to civilian court before SCOTUS heard arguments.

Looked it up ... Jose Padilla

[RoosterRedux]

I meant to add Five Eyes to MI6 as to whom we might use.

Per Wiki...

"Documents leaked by Snowden in 2013 revealed that the FVEY have been spying on one another's citizens and sharing the collected information with each other in order to circumvent restrictive domestic regulations on surveillance of citizens."

[Cboldt]

-- What about Julius & Ethel Rosenberg ? --

Espionage case. 18 USC 794. There is death penalty material in there.

[WildHighlander57]

Yes, there’s a screen cap of Sara Carter’s tweet here;

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3640290/posts?page=1269#1269

H/t SkyPilot

[FlossieBuzz]

Truth Leaks twitter - George Webb

list of famous senior executive serivce members

https://twitter.com/GeorgWebb/status/975404359503831041

https://twitter.com/GeorgWebb/status/975404567717347328

https://twitter.com/GeorgWebb/status/975404985235202048

https://twitter.com/GeorgWebb/status/975405273258037250

[DrDude]

Don’t forget that Lisa Page was a lawyer on Team meuller. He removed her after a few months when the texting scandal broke. She sure isn’t Military. Why would any Dem use her as a lawyer. She is a moron.

[Steven W.]

Well, when Obama wanted to go around FISA, he used MI6.

good point - here & now, beyond network setup in SA, I've wondered how Netanyahu has helped ;)

[RoosterRedux]

No idea.

BTW the relative was Kim Jong-Nam and he was assassinated in Malaysia at the airport IIRC.

[WildHighlander57]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3640290/posts?page=1352#1352

And the current list, there’s that (19) again...

Could that be what Q was referring to? The 19 9/11 perps?

[defconw]

Thank You! But would the threat of military tribunals not drain the very blood from them. Stick them in Gitmo to cool off! LOL! :)

[Bigg Red]

Interesting connection.

Palm Sunday is a week from today, and Easter two weeks from today.