[zzeeman]

The example that I gave before was from examining the posts in context on the 8 chan qresearch board. You can still ascertain some of the context if you want to avoid going there, and just examine them on one of the aggregator sites.

The diagram below illustrates how.

In the above example you can see:
- Post #905 is composed of two parts: the random anon's post (# 605232), and Q's reply (# 605255)
- the random anon's post (# 605232) was in response to Q's post (# 605197) that we saw in #903
- so we can see that the random anon was guessing that Q's "Twitter rec 24D." meant "Twatter in receivership in 24 days?"

Note: if you don't at least go and examine them on one of the aggregator sites, it is very hard to get the context from posts that are copied into our threads. Depending on how they are copied in, it is sometimes impossible to even see the difference from what is an actual Q post, versus a post of a random Anon that he is responding to.

Does that help make it more clear?

[TEXOKIE]

Yes, thank you very much, zzeeman.

[greeneyes]

I just go to the qanonposts.com. Then if I click on one of the drops @ the top right number (shown in color). That takes me right to that on the 8chan research board.

[JockoManning]

Thanks big.