Posted on 02/26/2018 12:31:46 AM PST by ransomnote
Be nice to RL... she’s here to help.
LOL! that is a possible explanation. I’ve decided to just appreciate the service he has undeniably given and if he says stuff I don’t hold with, well that is my privilege.... and what could I do about it anyway???? He as the 1st amendment like I do, and I do not believe I have a platform upon which he would see my opinions. I am as dust.
Being out on the Oklahoma Plain smack in the center of fly over country, my only true recourse about all these things happening is to pray for guidance for all who are the Players in the events unfolding - at whatever level.
Thank God for God! LOL!
... and of course, my fellow FReepers!
I was nice, took great restraint.
Yes, and for more. Was amended under GWB following Katrina. See John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122).
Revisions allowing federal military to be used in cases other than insurrection and rebellion are in Insurrection Act, 10 USC 251 et seq, in particular 10 USC 253.
I have been looking into the connections of Jeffrey Kasky, the father of one of the Florida school shooting activists.
Found quite a bit of information about his adoption service that went bankrupt.
Some of the back story on his adoption agency is discussed here. http://afterallitsasmallworld.com/tag/one-world-adoption-services/
Yesterday, One World Adoption Services, Inc. (OWAS) posted that they are closing their DRC adoption program. And we are celebrating this victory!!! So many things have led up to this the DRC exit letter suspension, these charges of fraud against the agency in Ethiopia but I cant help but think some it has to do with the many, many families who have been speaking out against the unethical and fraudulent practices of OWAS in DRC. We must continue to speak out against corruption and speak for the victims in these circumstances.
One World Adoption Services is getting a lot of press these days. (See my brave friend Caras recent posts: http://caralitchfield.blogspot.com/2013/11/a-mothers-prayer.html and http://caralitchfield.blogspot.com/2014/01/looking-up-part-one.html)
In response, their director, Susan Manning, has penned on her interpretation of the adoption requirements set forth by US Immigration. http://www.oneworldadoptions.org/blog/misconceptions-in-international-adoption-part-1/
I would love to take a few moments to respond:
While OWAS is able to cite the law on what the term orphan means for the purposes of adoption (as defined by USCIS), as shown by Caras story, our story, and at least 20 other families that I have spoken with directly, the staff of the OWAS orphanage routinely falsify documents to make the children that live in the orphanage meet the definition of orphan so that they can be adopted. For example, as in Caras case, they indicated that children were abandoned on the street, when in fact, the children are living at the orphanage with their biological mother, and in our case (and many many others) they say that fathers are unknown when they are known by everyone but the adoptive parents. Last year, the former director of the OWAS orphanage that said she routinely indicated that fathers were unknown because she knew thats what USCIS needed to see to approve adoptions. This is what we know.
As Susan told me when I met with her in August 2012, the staff of OWAS in Georgia do absolutely nothing to verify the documents they receive from DRC are true. Even after receiving multiple complaints other families in 2012 of falsified documents, they never did an audit of the children living in the orphanage. This is what we know.
While Susan encourages her clients to ask her caseworkers for more information, many of us have experienced serious deception by caseworkers. Weve been told that no information is available only to have documents show up later. Weve been told that children have no family to later discover large extended families. Weve been given ages of children that were clearly lies even the children themselves instructed to lie about their ages to make them seem more adoptable. This is what we know.”
:(
Thanks. I like to check on George Webb once a week or so. He does a good job of connecting the dots and figuring out who would be needed to allow a scam to work.
I think you are absolutely right on this.
Sorry, some questions are stupid.
True, for sure. And we humans come in a range of "social skills" or "get along" skills.
Especially on projects.
Wonder if that was it for Q.
I find it curious, the odds, that you can have some random event and are presented dots that connect. This one trafficking, another arms sales, another Redondo Beach / Clinton’s and the girls are all actresses.
I taught my kids that advertisements use 2 approaches; sex and iconoclasm.
I think not. If Q had gone silent since closing down greatawening, I'd feel differently, But Q left a number of remarks since then, in qresearch, and bothered to react to a perceived security breach and remark afterwards.
I figure quiet until there is a reason or benefit to stir the pot. At this point, quite a few irons in the fire.
Two things I’m expecting a ‘told ya’ from him on: op mockingbird derailed and the CDC guy being held in the dungeon of Trump Tower.
First, LOL @ Trump Tower as dungeon. Second, I'm drawing a blank on associating "CDC guy" with a particular scandal.
Funny this whole Q thing gives us a completely different perspective than most of us had just a few months ago...
I commented on this thread, just a regular non Q related comment,
Jeff Sessions Announces New Investigation Into Obama FBI FISA Abuse, Gowdy Responds
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3635799/posts
and when I went back looking through comments, it clicked in my head, there are going to be a lot of FReepers surprised too, when this whole thing breaks...
A whole bunch of our FRiends that could use some red pills if you know them or already have a good history with any of them... Tiny pills to start out and make them look into something and find out for themselves, Little bites to start with, or they will choke and cough and reject it. I have messed this up a couple times now by starting with too much information.
I tried to start a subliminal red pill thread here using a post I made on FaceBook with hope to start red pilling the unwilling and do battle on the opposition’s home field.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3635237/posts
and with a fellow Q follower Steve Van Doorn, maybe attempting to red pill me at first, we sort of tried to red pill some other FReepers.
Stumbled into the CDC ref ... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3635809/posts
Agree, I see some may consider my response harsh. I disagree and note that we are all adults. So with you recognizing the 'some questions' statement as true, going on about a relatively mild sarcastic response appears to be overkill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.