Q Anon: (2/21/18) Continued from Monday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

thestoryofq.com ^ | 2/21/2018 | Q Anon, Vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner (i.e., personal attacks).

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633313/posts

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:

http://www.thestoryofq.com/

You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize Q Anon information into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

[Steve Van Doorn]

We looked into what covfefe means. I think it has something to do with slang in Slovene. covfefe bill was after his post.

[TexasMeme]

Has there been any updates on the survivor in the truck? I’d love to her their account of what happened!

[saywhatagain]

I've tried reading through some of the docs. For me, surprise (yet) as this was thoroughly discussed in the 70's and I suppose my generation assumed this was SOP today.

One of my first memories all things political was as a standard of practice deny, deny and then deny again. To this day . . . Is that not the first three rules if caught with your paramour? Lie, then lie again, if the accuser still persists then tell they accuser its all their imagination. The way we were raised.

Again, nothing seems to stand out for me in these docs (yet) but got a chuckle when an anon posted this. Looks like CIA had not yet perfected suicide by heart attack yet.

[TXnMA]

I took Qanon's "Drone" to refer to the truck driver -- not an OHI surveillance platform.

YMMV...

[TXnMA]

Thanks! I wasn't aware that the NTSB had issued a preliminary report already.

Could/would you please share the URL with us?

[TexasMeme]

I totally support all of your ideas! Standing ovation for you Billy!

[Hostage]

Good for you, now explain how millions upon millions of votes can get reliably tabulated for state and national offices.

Also, take a look at 2004’s WA State Gubernatorial election where bags of ballots and absentee ballots unsealed by felons on parole were used to steal the election from a great GOP candidate, and where the Director of Elections was forced to resign and move out of state. All paper fraud, so paper and ink ain’t the complete answer.

American ingenuity can get at the root of the problem. But it has to be funded and diliently pursued.

[Keyhopper]

That look that says.........
I’m going all in on a poker hand when the deck is stacked, only to find out the other guy got your cards instead!

[Swordmaker]

read post 531: "the use of technology to avoid or frustrate law enforcement"

This is about the Cyber Task Force. Can you make sense of this statement? What does frustrate me? Wouldn't it frustrate the FBI when people claim they're contributing to the false flags?

If so wouldn't that suggest this purge might be something to do with this Cyber task force?

I can. This is about unbreakable encryption on iPhones. . . End-to-end 256 bit AES encryption for which only the user has the key and the FBI demand that Apple (and other tech companies) build in a back door (impossible, if security is the goal).

[DrDude]

Why has no one protested from the Podesta Team? someone muxt have a reason to talk. Just an observation.

---

That was my question to you in Post 492. In double post 504 & 505 you responded
Depends on what they were told. They may have been informed of a ton of incentives to keep quiet.
My own conjecture is that Tony is in Gitmo. And John is running around loose so they can observe all the folks he sees and communicates with and how much the next tiers are implicated thereby.

And, there’s some intel that John is not doing well physically, at all—whatever that means.

BTW, I’ve just received intel that one of your hyper-naysaying cohorts was repeatedly thoroughly !WRONG! in his conjectures about the pre-election period and who would run, win etc. He bet against Trump repeatedly. He was !WRONG! repeatedly. So much for that whining naysayer who pretends to be sooooooo !FULL! of pretend logical, erudite wisdom about Q-Anon.

However, we Q-Anon fans appreciate such a brazen string of being horribly wrong about Trump and various other election factoids. It provides us with a bit of humor to contrast that record with the bloke’s raging pontifications as though he is omniscient and thoroughly accurate in his blathering spews about Q-Anon.

His gross and horrendous lack of personal insight is a real trip, too. Must make him a real honey to be married to. And if he has teens—oh, Dear me. Round and round they must go

---

I have no idea what you are talking about. You gave me a snooty response when I asked. Then went dark when I tried to find out what you meant. I still haven’t heard who you think I am a Cohort of. I am not sure you are responding to the correct person. I am not involved with any other posters on FR. I purposely stayed out of your battle with a few people who were against Q. . I am a “leaning Q” person. I have never disparaged Q. I have helped with some of the Q posts with the creator of this thread. I don’t think I have ever commented to you prior to post 492. not sure why there is a problem but would have preferred a more logical response.

[tiki]

I’ve said from the beginning, Trump’s support in small town America was so overwhelming that the Dims couldn’t cheat their way out of it.

[gnarledmaw]

"Yes, it was." Was it? Im not sure the CIA went rogue. When you take a good look at Truman and the things he did and the people he knew and dig into Marshall and names like Wilson, Brookings, Prendergast, Carnegie, Rockerfeller, Etc start showing up, and you compare locations and all of that...it looks like they may have never been a force for anything other than what we know them as despite the reasons they were supposedly a force for good in the early years. Someone started working behind the scenes toward this end long ago.

[Keyhopper]

Professor bikelock was to be in court today.
Wonder how that’s going?

[little jeremiah]

I read a few articles in the week or so after the crash, but haven’t followed up on anything. I do remember the driver refused to have a Go Fund Me site for medical expenses; the garbage company named Time or something like that, had info on their site and IIRC, mentioned all three of the peoples’ names, one deceased, one more injured, and the need of $ for medical expenses.

The question was raised at the time, that if any passengers plus the driver were employees of the trash company, they would have insurance via the company.

So it was a bit weird.

[little jeremiah]

I was wondering about what “drone” meant.

[JockoManning]

Sorry my logic is not linear enough.

Sorry, given that I mistakenly slotted you 51% over the line into the group skeptical of Q. That was the cohort I was referring to.

Sorry I was snooty to you.

I didn't per se go dark. I sleep very odd and erratic hours and I have another life besides hereon. I try to respond to all posts to me hereon that are the least bit genuine at all.

I wish you well and appreciate your candor.

[little jeremiah]

I haven’t seen anything reliable. I think postponed or later date or something of that nature.

Okay, found this, I hate watching youtubes but this has stuff to read on it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuTmuSkw8rE

It claims Eric Canton’s attorney didn’t show, another one showed, and requested a continuance until April 5, judge agreed.

More info after that but I can’t watch at the moment. I would assume some kind of normal news might be around.

[DrDude]

No problems. Thankq

[Steve Van Doorn]

thanks

[JockoManning]

Thank you.