Posted on 02/19/2018 7:14:43 AM PST by SunkenCiv
A recent scientific study published in the renown "Europhysics News", The Magazine of the European Physical Society, (2012), Vol. 43, number 6, described how paleomagnetism study on several pyramid stones demonstrates the validity of Davidovits' theory on the artificial nature of Egyptian pyramid stones.
...Dr. Igor Túnyi ...and Ibrahim A. El-hemaly... made the following assumption (quote from their scientific paper):
Our paleomagnetic investigation of the two great Egyptian pyramids, Kufu and Khafre, is based on the assumption that if the blocks were made in situ by the geopolymer concrete technique described above, then their magnetic moments would all have been parallel, oriented approximately in the north-south direction. However, if the pyramids were constructed from blocks transported from the nearby quarries, having been rotated randomly during transport and construction, then the directions of their magnetic moments would be oriented randomly
Conclusion:
The aim of paleomagnetic investigation of the rock material of the great Egyptian pyramids, Khufu and Khafre, was to find out the directions of the magnetic polarization vectors of their building blocks... The analysis of a limited set of paleomagnetic samples provided the following results. The paleodirections of three sampling locations (2 from Khafre and 1 from Khufu pyramid) exhibit the common north-south orientation, suggesting that they may have been produced in situ by a concrete technique. The block from one sampling location of the Khafre pyramid is of natural limestone and evidently comes from the adjacent quarry. It is likely that the block from one sampling position of the Khufu pyramid comes also from the same quarry. Finally, we conclude that even if the geopolymer concrete technique was used, the pyramids were constructed from a mixture of natural and artificial limestone blocks.
(Excerpt) Read more at davidovits.info ...
Would love to see him do that with the stone of the pregnant woman at baalbek.
That is wacky - the Sumerians get about a half paragraph in the school books, then they move on.
Years ago I reached some of the same conclusions on my own, “great minds...” ha ha. It seems to me that some sort of cataclysm befalls humankind. It seems plenty of evidence that humankind is much older than popularly believed or suspected.
On the other hand it seems strange that North America doesn’t have any megalith structures or artifacts or anything whatsoever. Pretty big chunk of real estate. Even just a couple few hundred years ago it was virtually uninhabited. No disrespect intended to the Indian, just sayin’. That boggles my mind, to think of the centuries that went by - no matter how old one thinks the Sphinx or Great Pyramids are or any of those sites - 5,000 or 10,000 years, one big empty continent, for all practical purposes.
North AM had glaciers down past the present US-Canada border - winters must have really sucked over most of the US at during those millennia. Better to build in warmer climates as who is to say that the ice would not move even further south then. So the megalithic builders built from Mexico to Peru, but no further south as were more glaciers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
