Posted on 02/12/2018 3:56:31 AM PST by ransomnote
Edited on 02/13/2018 7:01:59 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to share information and opinions about Q Anon content. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3630912/posts?q=1&;page=1>
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my prior Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference:
A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
Please private message me to report trolls. The Admins have limited time to deal with requests regarding trolls and I'm hoping to reduce abuse reports from this thread from multiple persons into one set of requests.
If you are new to Q Anon trolls, you may find the following thread useful.
Q Anon: Increasing levels of disinformation and trolling
placemark
Confused - I was the one who wrote that suggestion to you.
I think I figured out what went wrong. Try that one, I think its right. :)
Ladies and Gentlemen, this thread is now retired. Welcome to Wednesdays new Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3631951/posts
Where was that photo taken?
For what it is worth, it always seemed like a bit of a stretch to me.
thermodynamics:
1. you can’t win, you can only break even.
2. you can only break even at absolute zero.
3. you can’t reach absolute zero.
To:
greeneyes; bagster; steve w.; swordmaker; jockomanning;bitt
Just a note to explain my disappointed to see the Book of Enoch referenced or an explanation re those who may post objections to this book on the thread, the following link explains why some of us cannot treat the book as legitimate bible canon:
https://www.gotquestions.org/book-of-Enoch.html
Joans probably right.....
So much homework.So the key is the map?Need more coffee.Thanks Steven W
Bttt
I do not treat the book of Enoch as biblical canon. It was interesting reading from a time period long ago. Just as I found A Tale of Two Cities to be interesting reading about a time long ago.
It did not seem to me that other people were necessarily saying that it was canon either.
And I think that the Q posts should also be taken with a grain of salt, since we often don’t know till after an event whether the cryptic messages have been interpreted correctly.
Nevertheless, all manner of Q stuff has been posted that is considered by many to be “out there”. So who would know that merely mentioning a piece of historical writing would be a bridge too far.
I am really sorry to have offended your sensibilities.
The “Church Fathers” and the Book of Enoch
wow
It is not for me to say whether the Book of Enoch should be canonical or not or whether it is a "real" account or not, but I will say that one of my favorite Old Testament scholars, Dr James Kugel, holds it is great esteem--referring to it as part of the ancient Jewish writings along with the Books of Jubilees and Jasher.
FWIW, Dr Kugel believes the nephilim are indeed the offspring of human women and fallen angels.
"Kugel is Professor Emeritus in the Bible Department at Bar Ilan University in Israel and the Harry M. Starr Professor Emeritus of Classical and Modern Hebrew Literature at Harvard University."
Wow! I really don’t think a nerdy teen could come up with all this. Q is an adult. I can’t read code but this would take a very orderly mind to embed these clues. Q is not crazy.
Simply, WOW
Media Bias: Of all the many recent examples of glaring media bias, none stands out so much as the rank politicization by the U.S. media of the South Korean Winter Olympics. What should be a happy, come-together moment for all of America rooting for its athletes, instead became a hate-Trump, #Resistance moment for the far-left media. ...
In a way, I’m happy to see my enemy reveal themselves with such clarity
What really frightens you and me, is the idea that people will vote for them and their communist/tyrannical ideas that are pure satanism.
Well, enough propel rejected that and gave us majorities in the house, senat, state legislatures, and....potus
Dear God, this is One Nation Under God, you cannot allow this nation and Israel to Perish from this Earth....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.