[greeneyes]

Define “inside job”. Is it possible that evil doers had explosives planted in the buildings along with the “kamikaze Arab” pilots?

I just happened to be watching TV during 9/11. I heard explosions, dozens of people talking about bombs going off-including 1st responders saying this. I saw what looked exactly like controlled demolitions I had seen before.

I read the 9/11 commission report-should be called CYA report. Who would benefit from taking down the WTC? I read that it had a lot of asbestos-very expensive renovations were going to be needed.

Port Authority had recently turned over to new lessee(Silverstein - alleged friend of David Rockefeller).

He had secured Ins. for full value of WTC for each incident. He and Ins. company went to court - he claimed 2 incidents and they claimed 1. He prevailed. Plenty of money to pay off loan, build new building, and avoid expense of asbestos removal.

In addition, I have read that the debris tested positive for the type of explosives that would likely have been used. I have no idea whether that is accurate.

I do know that WTC 7 was not hit by an airplane, and it went down too -exactly like a controlled demolition. I don't recall all the details on records that were destroyed, but it included some financial, as well as CIA etc. There was something along those lines at WTC 1 or 2 too, but I can't remember details.

Does the fact that the Empire State building was hit by a plane and did not have big fire, and collapse have any relevance? Was the Empire State Building inherently stronger that WTC?

I have no conclusions, but lots of questions, and certainly there are people in the world who might not hesitate to help jihads along for their own financial benefit.

So it's important to define the term, and I'm willing to expand my thinking on the subject, after researching it.

[Steven W.]

Is it possible that evil doers had explosives planted in the buildings along with the “kamikaze Arab” pilots?

Possible & 'both' not out of the realm of improbable (first I'd considered!) but I've always dismissed as fog of war - if you ever went to Ground Zero after the attacks, it was a mess, everything was gone ... except the little colonial era church that was spared and barely damaged.

[madison10]

The Empire State Building was not hit by the same type of plane as in 9/11. The 9/11 ones were airliners full of fuel, but the one that hit the Empire State building was a B-25 which was not nearly as large as the airliners. Also, the planes of 9/11 came at the buildings with full force, not sure about the B-25 as he was navigating in fog.

The killers did not need to plant explosives as the planes themselves were the bombs.

[TEXOKIE]

Trump even stated at the time that bombs brought down the Towers on 9/11

http://yournewswire.com/trump-bombs-911/