At the time - and I now even more think this - that what was being said is that UBL was taken out instead of being taken to Gitmo. They could have (and should have!) captured him for the intel. But it was a kill mission. The reason? So he couldn’t talk. I don’t think 9/11 was an “inside job” but, rather, UBL was financed via SA and the “company” was all enmeshed (for good reasons) with the mujahadeen in Afghanistan, similar to how the “company” was in bed with lesser elements in Central America (Ollie North) and, now, it seems, worldwide pedo rings as well. These connections are used to facilitate the US interests but they run awry and off the tracks and then evil overtakes good. My inference was not that 9/11 was “inside job” but, rather, we were playing footsie with the devil and ended up getting burned ;(
I just happened to be watching TV during 9/11. I heard explosions, dozens of people talking about bombs going off-including 1st responders saying this. I saw what looked exactly like controlled demolitions I had seen before.
I read the 9/11 commission report-should be called CYA report. Who would benefit from taking down the WTC? I read that it had a lot of asbestos-very expensive renovations were going to be needed.
Port Authority had recently turned over to new lessee(Silverstein - alleged friend of David Rockefeller).
He had secured Ins. for full value of WTC for each incident. He and Ins. company went to court - he claimed 2 incidents and they claimed 1. He prevailed. Plenty of money to pay off loan, build new building, and avoid expense of asbestos removal.
In addition, I have read that the debris tested positive for the type of explosives that would likely have been used. I have no idea whether that is accurate.
I do know that WTC 7 was not hit by an airplane, and it went down too -exactly like a controlled demolition. I don't recall all the details on records that were destroyed, but it included some financial, as well as CIA etc. There was something along those lines at WTC 1 or 2 too, but I can't remember details.
Does the fact that the Empire State building was hit by a plane and did not have big fire, and collapse have any relevance? Was the Empire State Building inherently stronger that WTC?
I have no conclusions, but lots of questions, and certainly there are people in the world who might not hesitate to help jihads along for their own financial benefit.
So it's important to define the term, and I'm willing to expand my thinking on the subject, after researching it.
Your post # about the devil is 666. : )