Here is my concern -
It wasn’t clear to me who took the plane down. If it was the “good guys” then to me they are no longer good guys. If that is the case, then both sides are beyond anything I can imagine and I am not on either side. I’m on no side. Or the third side.
If it was the Clintons, or similar, then it doesn’t surprise me and I would do anything I could to help stop them. (I remember the Ron Brown “plane crash” murder. Also Seal Team 6 helicopter “crash” murder.)
It wasn't the good guys. It was someone trying to cover up the U1 scandal.
Q used the word “SICK” in connection with this plane take down, to me it seemed quite clear the black hats (whichever ones they were) took it down.
I’m inclined to think the plane crashed was caused by the Black Hats, either here or in Russia. (They might be the same folks). Q calls them ‘Sick’ for their antics.
If it was the Clintons and if Russia wasn't part of it, then there may be some serious he** to pay for the Clinton mob. Best not to mess with the bear, regardless of how much uranium you sold them.
I’ve had that question too. I hope the white hats did not do that. But the issue to which I was responding was, something like “who would take down a plane with other innocent people?” I was seeking to address that, that yes, “collateral damage” does occur...and some don’t give a flying orange peel about how much collateral damage happens.