Posted on 02/07/2018 5:09:09 PM PST by Swordmaker
Good grief! That is just a metaphor. Very flimsy!
Yawn. I’m a busy person, your profile, history, belief would not interest me, and your comments are predictable snottiness.
Neither Bannon nor AJ could possible “be Q” and anyone familiar with either Q, Bannon or AJ would never even propose such stupid ides with any sincerity.
Do you know the origin of the term, ‘snowflake,’? It was coined to describe leftists who take offense very easily. In fact, any deviation from the ideologies they already embrace offends them.
Political Correctness is the progenitor of snowflakism. PC was developed by the Left as a means of throttling all but official Leftist ideology.
Conservatives have generally been more open to hearing ideas we disagree with. All we ask is a fair forum in which to present our side of the argument. In any fair debate, conservatives do exceptionally well because our beliefs are grounded in facts, reality and objective truth.
Since the Q threads are not Caucus-only, varying POVs are allowed. Everyone taking part in the discussion should be civil and—hopefully—rational. But lockstep ideology where Q is concerned is not required.
How hard would it be for you to simply skip over my comments? I’m presently skipping the entire posts of two individuals. I haven’t found it burdensome at all. It’s something you might consider trying. Just a thought.
How can we make you see that YOU STARTED IT. You start all the arguments about why we shouldn’t follow Q etc etc. can’t you just leave us alone to go down our own rabbit hole? If we want to follow him/her, we will. Your arguments are just irritating. Maybe I was wrong about you being on every single Q thread, but if it’s not 100%, it’s 95%. I just don’t have time to go through every single one looking for your posts. But you certainly found the “Trump is our savior” post quickly. Did you have it saved or something?
Since your prior post showed you had already gone there, I thought you might be interested in reality, rather than “Q” type pipedreams.
Understand your forgetting. On a sober morning, it is often best to forget the night before, as long as the cops do too.
P.S. Do you really call it “little jeremiah.” If so, your honesty, on at least that one item, is a good sign.
Even if its genetic that is no excuse. Character flaws can be worked on and moderated if a person is sincere.
From Bing:
met·a·phor
NOUN a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable:
"“I had fallen through a trapdoor of depression,” said Mark, who was fond of theatrical metaphors"
Not seeing it. It looks to be a more literal than metaphorical usage.
ROTFLOL
Maybe while doing a headstand?
I can appreciate that some people lie knowingly and purposely.
I glanced at your sign up date.
All I’ve done is to join in a discussion on a discussion forum. There is nothing either illegal or sinful about doing so.
Would it be possible for Q-believers to decide whether I know too much about the subject or too little? I’ve been accused of both.
That is your opinion. The rest of us do not take it literally.
Since the Q threads are not Caucus-only, varying POVs are allowed.
You don’t discuss. You argue. There is a difference. I don’t recall anyone saying you knew too much about Q.
I have never heard a Christian call Trump their savior. I would certainly never, ever call him mine. If that language strikes you as a normal, routine Christian reference, so be it. Otoh, I am unaware of anyone in the New Testament being referred to as our savior than Jesus.
I hold the Q-believers in high esteem. I do not believe a single one of them will melt, snowflake-like, if they are exposed to a POV that differs from their own.
Proverbs 27:17
Iron sharpens iron, So one man sharpens another.
You are really pushing it. Your skills in logic are woefully inadequate. Please explain to me how you know Q meant “savior” as in “Christ” and not “savior” as in “Patton” or any other military hero.
Could you link me to the most offensive incident in which I was arguing, not discussing? It would be helpful to see an example. [Btw, does this rule about not arguing apply to everyone equally? Because I’ve witnessed arguments on FR every day that I’ve visited the site. They seem more the rule than the exception.]
You said I found the Q quote very quickly. All that demonstrates is that I know what he said. Is that a problem?
All I know is what Q said. He said POTUS is our savior. As a Christian I find that a bizarre comment (at best). POTUS is not my savior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.