Could you link me to the most offensive incident in which I was arguing, not discussing? It would be helpful to see an example. [Btw, does this rule about not arguing apply to everyone equally? Because I’ve witnessed arguments on FR every day that I’ve visited the site. They seem more the rule than the exception.]
You said I found the Q quote very quickly. All that demonstrates is that I know what he said. Is that a problem?
How about right now? Insisting that Q meant “savior as in Christ” and not “savior as in Patton.” You are being obstinate in your insistence that your interpretation is correct. I think you have latched on to the “savior as in Christ” argument to justify your argument that Q is phony. You are refusing to see my POV that “savior” meant a military savior.