How about right now? Insisting that Q meant “savior as in Christ” and not “savior as in Patton.” You are being obstinate in your insistence that your interpretation is correct. I think you have latched on to the “savior as in Christ” argument to justify your argument that Q is phony. You are refusing to see my POV that “savior” meant a military savior.
No, you are the one arguing. I’m simply stating two facts.
One: Q said POTUS is our savior.
Two: that is not language that I’ve ever heard any Christian use.