[Fantasywriter]

No, you are the one arguing. I’m simply stating two facts.

One: Q said POTUS is our savior.

Two: that is not language that I’ve ever heard any Christian use.

[nanetteclaret]

You really are determined to see only your own point of view aren’t you? This is why it’s not a discussion. And for what it’s worth, I am a Christian and I believe that the Lord is using Trump to clean out the cesspool of wickedness. I believe he is a military savior. So there!

[Fresh Wind]

Keep in mind that “Savior” and “savior” are not necessarily the same thing, just as “God” and “god” are fundamentally different.

[JockoManning]

Ahhhhh. “A” is steadfast but “B” is stubborn. What a handy way to construe reality!

[JockoManning]

Most of the better Christians I've been closest to tend to avoid such a metaphor ... most of the time. I have heard it maybe several dozen times in my life--by Christians--genuine Christians--as a metaphor. And Qx and I have heard it in psychological discussions--even by Christians--a fair amount. NO ONE involved or looking on assumed the one using the metaphor really thought XYZ meant to replace Christ as a person's savior.

Rescuing someone from breaking through the pond ice or from a burning building makes "A" the savior of "B" and may be called so. No one assumes "B" suddenly replaces Jesus with "A" as their eternal savior.