If you’re not talking about the Arfcom thread then I have no idea what you could be referring to. If you *are* talking about the Arfcom thread, then there were several references to actual theories posited by Q-believers. The Arfcom posters weren’t making anything up at all. They just mentioned a few of the actual theories that are being seriously considered by Q supporters.
The factual information was mainly on the 2nd and 3rd pp of the thread. Iirc, the timestamp explanation extended over both those pp. The ATT reference was, I believe, explained on p 3. There was also an image posted by Q, ahead of the time that it was posted by the Pentagon. I’m doing all this via memory, but if I’m right that one was explained on p 4 (i.e.: it’s a traditionally posted image that has appeared on that same date in multiple prior years).
The airplane window pic was explained on The_Donald. That’s the site on which the conservative coders post, and nothing technical gets past them. That’s why The_Donald effectively rejected Q in the first week of Nov. Unlike many on this site the ‘centipedes,’ haunt 4Chan. They posted Q’s first predictions within hours of them appearing on /pol. As I’ve mentioned, the consensus was simple and to the point. If the predictions were fulfilled, the ‘pedes would conclude Q was real. If the predictions bombed, the ‘pedes would agree that Q was a LARP.
The predictions bombed. That very first Q thread on The_Donald now has an update in the header. It says, “It was a LARP.”
A couple of feeble attempts have been made to revive Q on The_Donald. They’ve been shot down right out of the gate. The tech savvy generation doesn’t have a lot of time or patience for larpers, at least not re something this important. As someone else mentioned, Q is now considered a Boomer phenomenon. They believe boomers are more technologically gullible than they are. It would be very hard to argue otherwise.
If I could make one point, it’s this. Among those who watched Q’s first predictions spectacularly fail in real time, Q has few if any believers. Among those who came along later, and only got into the cycle after Q started posting codes and riddles, he has a much higher percentage of believers.
Iow, the point at which a person was introduced to Q makes a huge—if not all—the difference. Those who came late try to ignore, reinterpret or disavow the earliest predictions. Those who followed Q in real time were not a priori operating with a pro-Q bias. They simply looked at the results and drew the obvious/only conclusion.
I explicitly mentioned the thread, and pointed out that all references to Q were put in as unflattering a light as possible.
You then deign to act like I avoided the subject, and try to tell me that the posts in that thread talk about theories from Q's supporters.
And then you go on and on about 4chan, as though that site is esoteric and only *you* have heard of it.
And yet you blather on in vague second hand generalities; you are obviously re-telling the canned arguments of others which you have no direct experience with, nor the intellect to understand.
The 4chan argument about the photo from the Pentagon...*snerk*. The point was the individual who posted it, not vaguely "the Pentagon" : and within a day or so of Q's post. That argument derives from vague hand-waving and the strawman of "obscurity" in that the photo was supposed to have been so unusual, that its posting was its own guarantee of authenticity. But it was the proximity in *time*, and the other individual who Tweeted it, that constituted the significance.
Q said it best about you and your ilk: "These people are stupid."
Your post
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3624983/posts?page=418#418
took us to the following link
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Anyone-following-QAnon-on-4Chan-/5-2062886/
Note the following:
The posts on that thread (which *you* chose) has only 1 which even paraphrases, let alone quotes, even Q supporters.
12-20-2017 9:20:43 AM EST by Stoney0102
You need to be in the magical land of the Saudi Arabia purge thread. Them boys are not only off the deep end, but the have plowed into the beach on the other side.
Some notes:
They believe that there is a shadow war going on between Trump/Mathis against an international cabal of politics, world leaders, aliens, ms-13, etc.
They believe Soros is being held at camp David.
They believe that the Atlanta blackout was a spec op to sneak out a high value target.
They believe Obama has been arrested.
They believe the train derailment was retaliation for ATL.
This super duper secret info is all being given to us in riddles by an anonymous person on 8chan.
ETA: oh and if you point out flaws, poke fun, or don’t believe, you are put on ignore.
= = = = = = = = =
Note that those things are possible interpretations of what Q has said, interpreted in light of very real current events.
Q has openly Tweeted to Lyn de Rothschild: taunting her that “we can hear you breathe” and that “calling for help at this point will not save you.”
Lyn de Rothschild married into the Rothschild family. Why didn’t she block the Tweets, why
didn’t anyone else call them out?
The “aliens” are not real - Q warned that if the Deep State got desperate, they release “Fake News” of aliens
to distract attention, or frighten people into demanding a return to the status quo.
The Soros being held at Camp David was interpreted, in light of the fact that Q said a special place was being prepared for Soros (or words to that effect), and shortly afterward, the President Tweted that Camp David was a special place. That phrase is unusual enough, that its appearance cannot be automatically written off as coincidence.
Atlanta (one of the busiest airports in the world) DID black out. Why did their backup generators fail?
And it is true that ONE plane was allowed to take off: and Q DID explicitly say
And about the train derailment being in retaliation for the Atlanta airport, this was Q himself, not his fans getting carried away.
OnDec. 18 Q had Tweeted:
Dec 18 2017 22:51:20
Anonymous
ID: fc4520
121501
>>121491
Seconding this. The context of that train crash seems relevant. High value target aboard?
Dec 18 2017 22:53:53
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
ID: 82d434
121519
>>121501
We would not ‘intentionally’ harm a person in the pursuit of a TARGET.
This was retaliatory re: ATL.
Q
As far as the international cabal? On Dec 14 2017 Q had posted in part:
Another Hint:
Ian Cameron
McKinsey & Company
Clowns In America.
Dr. Emmett J. Rice.
Federal Reserve.
Everyone is connected.
How about a nice game of chess?
Q
= = = = = = = = = = =
As I posted back in 2005 :
(*)McKinsey’s motives in this, however, may not be as pure as the wind-driven snow, or even the silt-ridden Ganges. According to an article from The Times of India, McKinsey is being paid to generate jobs in India: “The Karnataka government would like to see more jobs created in these areas and has mandated consultancy firm McKinsey to formulate a strategy to generate one million jobs by 2008.” QED.