I explicitly mentioned the thread, and pointed out that all references to Q were put in as unflattering a light as possible.
You then deign to act like I avoided the subject, and try to tell me that the posts in that thread talk about theories from Q's supporters.
And then you go on and on about 4chan, as though that site is esoteric and only *you* have heard of it.
And yet you blather on in vague second hand generalities; you are obviously re-telling the canned arguments of others which you have no direct experience with, nor the intellect to understand.
The 4chan argument about the photo from the Pentagon...*snerk*. The point was the individual who posted it, not vaguely "the Pentagon" : and within a day or so of Q's post. That argument derives from vague hand-waving and the strawman of "obscurity" in that the photo was supposed to have been so unusual, that its posting was its own guarantee of authenticity. But it was the proximity in *time*, and the other individual who Tweeted it, that constituted the significance.
Q said it best about you and your ilk: "These people are stupid."
If you didn’t have personal smears you’d have nothing. If the truth were on your side you could conduct a civil and fact-based discussion. Instead it’s one insult after another.
Your unchecked hostility fundamentally discredits you. Nastiness is not an argument. More importantly, you misrepresented everything I posted. That does you no credit.
Btw, your posts reveal exactly why Q flourishes on FR. Q gives the nastiest posters an excuse to be as snarly as they want to be—and all the Q-believers love it. It’s a cult of insults. That’s one reason it died so quickly on The_Donald; they don’t have cults of insults over thete.