Q Anon: Last information in conserv. media says FBI has edited 4 page memo

vanity | 2/1/2018 | Vanity

[ransomnote]

Well, ladies and gentlemen, it's not over yet re the memo. Twitter sources are reporting (3 am PDT) that 5 FBI members met to revise the 4 page memo before it is released. This info was from conservative sources only. Please take a moment to check and see if this has changed by the time you read it.

If the intention really remains to be that We The People will "take what we can get" and be quiet about it - WE DO NOT CONSENT.

I recommend that Twitterers take to wing, we call congress critters, email them, let them no it's not over until we see the unaltered memo. I will put a few links below for those who have not seen them yet.

1) Q Anon: What lies ahead and how might we able to be a source of support http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3624518/posts

2)Q Post believed to be President Trump’s words to prepare you for today http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3623792/posts

Friendly recommendations: Please pray against the deep state and corrupt elements of the FBI that their attempts to withhold the memo from us in its unaltered state will fail.

Please pray for patriots to swarm all media, email and phone numbers of so-called "representatives' to demand your right to see the memo.

Please continue to pray for success and safety of our president and our patriots.

[trebb]

We can always hope - after all Us Americans are dreamers too.....

[Liz]

I guess Calypso Louis was calling some of the shots---not that the lying Halfrican isnt as corrup as they come.

[9YearLurker]

So Attkisson’s sources are preparing her for dirt that may come out on them as well?

Somehow they are supposed to be making career-primping decisions instead of coming out on the side of law and order?

[Travis McGee]

Those cowardly FLEAs are waiting to see which side is going to win in the coup/counter-coup, before they decide honor their sworn oaths, or just go along and become out-and-out Stasi stooges.

Shameful and disgusting.

[Cowgirl of Justice]

Was John Brennan at the SOTU?

I thought I saw a glimpse of him there near the front.

[PapaBear3625]

It would be simple enough for committee folks, who approved the release, to say whether or not what is released is the same as what they reviewed.

It is the committee which will be doing the release. They will release what they sent to the President. The Executive branch will have no role in "editing" the memo. At most, the FBI hierarchy will be told that they will be free to issue their own press release containing their thoughts on items needing clarification.

[Bigg Red]

Thank you for that.

[PapaBear3625]

In the rules, section 2 B, it says "The select committee may disclose publicly such information after the expiration of a five-day period.... This means that there is a final vote to release.

[Bigg Red]

See a good explanation at #9.

[txhurl]

We are going to see the unedited Nunes memo.

---

He needs to read it into the Congressional Record 15 minutes ago, on the House floor. Otherwise, the swamp will destroy all the work he’s done over the last year.

[Bigg Red]

Do you mean John Solomon?

[MNDude]

my bad. yes.

[JockoManning]

You and the other Q posters here are doing a great job, and it is much appreciated by many of us.

Amen.

[JockoManning]

Well put.

[JockoManning]

I think you’re right. BTW, great to see you still posting ‘round these parts.

[JockoManning]

Atkinson’s statement on the unease of the truth seekers over bad guys prevailing sounds just like the scenarios that play out in the third world, where coups are reoccurring events. It is the supreme power struggle between good and evil. No longer can it be said that only in America we practice a peaceful transitional change of political power. Obozo destroyed that legacy along and so much more.

Bears repeating.

[JockoManning]

Good chuckle—almost a guffaw.

[JockoManning]

I suppose so. IF they want to be prissy about it. I doubt POTUS will be prissy. Doubt the Committee GOP will be prissy. Schiff for brains might well be ... but I think he's treading a very shaky thin line or high wire ... if the indications about the hotel in California are true.

Actually, he may be trying to do a frantic hoe-down stomp on very very thin ice.

[JockoManning]

A reasonable guess.

However, I don't think you can be certain about that. Trump will be Trump. We won't know how it will precisely play out, imho, until it does.

[OKSooner]

Cool, thanks for the tweet from Sharyl Attkisson. I don't tweet, my own self.

For some of us (speaking only for my own self) who have been trying to decipher all the Q stuff, at the same time as, you know, going to work and having a life and stuff, this is helpful.

It helps that we know who Sharyl is. It clarifies things, and it brings her credibility to the message.

I hear her say there is conflict ongoing in the alphabet agencies we've all been talking about and it's time for the good people to pick one side or the other. No more living in the gray area and managing one's career according to which way the political winds favor. That paradigm is gone.

Sharyl says so.

I believe her because I know who she is. :)