What has Q "predicted" that couldn't be logically deduced from publicly available information?
Honest question.
Asking freerepublic who they think will get indicted, and 90% will predict that nobody will. If indictments come, that will show right away that is a much better predictor than most of the people here.
He has predicted very specific words multiple times that would appear in Trump’s tweets.
How about that the Lords Prayer was going to be changed?
Several days later the Pope did.
How bout them apples?
His timing has been on in more than enough by now—e.g., Australia and the Clinton Foundation—to know that he is an insider.
My leaning is that he/they are insiders on the good side, but I don’t totally rule out the possibility that he is an insider from the black hats, trying to lead those who are awake to embarrassing themselves and discrediting the accusers.
I think it’s about 75/25 that they’re on the good side, but of course with their own biases, vested interests, blind spots, and limited ultimate influence.