[grey_whiskers]

(Hint: by calling Q's posting and related discussion "conspiracy theory" you are already discrediting it, *and* presenting yourself as the "neutral" arbiter, and presuming to give a troll the OK.

Flockov. (That's Russian, in case you didn't understand).

[John O]

Excellent. If you do not believe it is a conspiracy theory then present proof. Or simply answer the question as dforest did in post 175.

Until proof one way or another can be presented it IS a conspiracy theory. That is not judging it as true or false, it is just recognizing that it is unproven as of this point.

My point is that there is no reason to be insulting anyone over simply asking a question. Everyone here except Jim R is a n00b to someone.

You call the original poster (of this line of discussion) a troll and yet you present no proof that he is or that he isn’t. It’s kind of the liberal “accuse them of anything until something sticks” line of reasoning. That is unnecessary. Just discuss the issues.