Apparently, Medved is unfamiliar with the legal concept of, ‘presumption of innocence.’
Or, he’s ignoring it because Roy Moore is a threat to the establishment.
“Apparently, Medved is unfamiliar with the legal concept of, ‘presumption of innocence.’
Or, he’s ignoring it because Roy Moore is a threat to the establishment.”
The latter. The stooge is a lawyer and knows better.
Bingo. I’m done with even considering “sexual accusations” with no solid evidence when they happen mere weeks before an election. It is just too convenient and it’s always the left that comes up with them. It puts a candidate in an impossible position, causing them to require proving their innocence. The power of the Senate is in the balance and this is just too typical, too low life left wing politics that does an injustice to real victims - but they don’t care about them. All is fair game in their political games.
Now they’re trying to stir up the Trump accusers because of Franken. Big difference, no immediate election but photo evidence, along with no denial for at least one.
That only applies to a court of law, not a court of public opinion. Bill and Hillary haven't been convicted and are presumed innocent, but they are guilty as hell. I don't presume Roy Moore is innocent, I believe he is innocent based upon the quality of the witnesses alleging wrongdoing.
Yesterday Medved was still citing bogus “facts” from the forger and the Democrat sheriff.
It’s all very queer that none of this has surfaced in his previous campaigns or even during the primary. But as the election loomed, we got yet another media coordinated October Surprise and the media has been caught red handed pushing fake news (like the forged yearbook that was later “corrected” to report that some of the text had been added later by another hand although initially it was passed off as genuinely by Roy Moore, making it A FORGED artifact).