(most of it is public)
friends of Sarrufs and most of the Toutonghi clan
oddly, he goes by the French name of Jean Marie, but this is clearly John P., son of Philippe
email: johntoutonghi@gmail.com
Posted on 12/10/2017 5:08:23 PM PST by Elderberry
In an interview last Friday with “Freedom Friday” host Carl Gallups, Obama birth-certificate lead investigator Mike Zullo revealed for the first time that the “Deep State” prevented a federal investigation of his findings, compiled over a 5+-year period, that the “long-form” birth certificate image posted by the Obama White House in 2011 is a “computer-generated forgery.”
Virtually unknown in the United States prior to the election of Donald J. Trump last year, the term “Deep State” has now been invoked by some newscasters, journalists and commentators as well as by Trump himself through his Twitter account. Left-leaning news outlets reluctantly discussed it beginning in early March, after Trump claimed on Twitter that he and his campaign aides had been “wiretapped” during the final months of the presidential campaign.
On March 9, 2017, Politico Magazine declared, “The Deep State Is a Figment of Steve Bannon’s Imagination,” referring to then-White House Senior Adviser Steve Bannon, now Editor-in-Chief at Breitbart News.
The article begins, featuring a photo of Bannon:
Here’s a handy rule for assessing the credibility of what you’re reading about national security in the Trump era: If somebody uses the term “Deep State,” you can be pretty sure they have no idea what they’re talking about.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
He’s getting old and decrepit. And I don’t mean the dog.
She went to school with the children of Bob Hope, dontcha know...in Hollywood!
Nope, that’s the first I ever saw it. Russians, fancy that.
And look, there’s a David!
You’ll have to fill us in, I wasn’t aware of the conscientious objector. What did he object to?
Not a good look for a professor of mathematics. Can’t deduct 1933 from 2017.
Just like his sister in law wanted us to believe that if you add 18 months to June 1959, you get August 1961.
Must run in the family.
SSN -- REGISTRATION DATE -- NAME -- ADDRESS 042-68-4424 -- March 21, 1977 -- Thomas Louis Wood -- Newington, Connecticut 042-68-4425 -- March ??, 1977 -- Barack Hussein Obama -- Honolulu, Hawaii 042-68-4429 -- March 16, 1977 -- Paul Michael Graziano -- Yorktown, Connecticut
In the U.S. during WW1, religious conscientious objectors were joined by members of pacifist sects from the newer waves of immigrants, such as the Molokans and the Doukhobors, who had come from Russia after 1903 to escape service in the Czar’s army.
In many European countries conscientious objectors were imprisoned or, in some cases, even executed.
SSN — REGISTRATION DATE — NAME — ADDRESS
042-68-4424 — March 21, 1977 — Thomas Louis Wood — Newington, Connecticut
042-68-4425 — March ??, 1977 — Barack Hussein Obama — Honolulu, Hawaii
042-68-4429 — March 16, 1977 — Paul Michael Graziano — Yorktown, Connecticut
So we want to know if zero was in Connecticut in March 1977? When he would have been 16?
What IF that number belongs to the son of the Kenyan and Anna? He could well have been in the US at the same time as Mark was...Mark went to the same college as the son of Joseph and Mary. (Yes, I know, it’s not Christmas.)
Mark had an address in Bayonne, and the son of the Kenyan and Anna would have had a birth record from (probably) Hawaii.
https://www.distancefromto.net/distance-from-connecticut-to-bayonne-us
I think I originaly found Mark’s address on People Search, a long time ago. Along with an old Russian peasant named NIZDON. Maybe NIZDON is Russian for BAKER.
Does anyone still care?
Sven’s declarative answers were never properly sourced and were pure conjecture.
The Cuban children were classified as REFUGEES escaping political consequences, therefore the ordinary visa requirements were waived for US entry.
“The creation of Operation Pedro Pan is credited to Father Bryan O Walsh who functioned as the Director of the now defunct Catholic Welfare Bureau (which became the Catholic Charities organization). Fearing that their children would grow up subject to state compelled Marxist-Leninist indoctrination, Cuban parents requested the Catholic Welfare Bureau to allow them to send their children to the U.S., specifically to Miami where many of them had relatives. Once the U.S. announced its break in diplomatic ties with Cuba on January 3, 1961,63 the U.S. Department of State authorized the Catholic Welfare Bureau to inform the parents in Cuba that ............ the government waived the visa requirements for their children,........ thereby enabling the children to come to Miami via U.S. commercial flights. Once the operation of commercial flights between Cuba and the U.S. ended in October 1962, the children would be sent to Spain or Mexico and then re-routed to Miami.
Without a US passport, Barry would have had to possess a valid US visa for entry. Without this in hand, he could not board an international inbound flight to the USA. Perhaps they went to the US embassy in Jakarta and acquired one to expedite his travel.
All the rest is purely conjecture by Sven. An adult boarding an international flight in the 60’s would have been refused at the ticket gate in Jakarta. An unaccompanied minor would have been absolutely undeniably rejected.
“...An adult boarding an international flight in the 60’s would have been refused at the ticket gate in Jakarta. An unaccompanied minor would have been absolutely undeniably rejected.”
Makes sense. However, let’s allow for the political situation in Indonesia at the time. He might have been accompanied by a member of Kopassus and that changes the circumstances somewhat. Something took place that required the boy to be removed from Indonesia. That period of history there is not commonly understood.
Indonesia’s transition to the “New Order” in the mid-1960s, ousted the country’s first president, Sukarno, after 22 years in the position. One of the most tumultuous periods in the country’s modern history, it was the commencement of Suharto’s 31-year presidency.
Described as the great dhalang (”puppet master”), Sukarno drew power from balancing the opposing and increasingly antagonistic forces of the army and Indonesian Communist Party (PKI). By 1965, the PKI extensively penetrated all levels of government and gained influence at the expense of the army.[1]
On 30 September 1965, six of the military’s most senior officers were killed in an action (generally labelled an “attempted coup”) by the so-called 30 September Movement, a group from within the armed forces. Within a few hours, Major General Suharto mobilised forces under his command and took control of Jakarta. Anti-communists, initially following the army’s lead, went on a violent purge of communists throughout the country, killing an estimated half million people and destroying the PKI, which was officially blamed for the crisis.[2][3]
The politically weakened Sukarno was forced to transfer key political and military powers to General Suharto, who had become head of the armed forces. In March 1967, the Indonesian parliament (MPRS) named General Suharto acting president. He was formally appointed president one year later. Sukarno lived under virtual house arrest until his death in 1970.
~~~
In 1970...is it possible the son of the friend of Sukarno was ejected from the country?
Yes, it’s most likely that on an individual case basis that they could have pleaded their case to the US embassy an obtained some sort of emergency waiver of a visa requirement.
But this article did not mention any en masse waiver for Indonesians during that time frame.
http://stthomaslawreview.org/articles/v27/2/callan.pdf
Maybe she personally delivered him to Hawaii and they just fudged the documentation released through the FOIA to coincide with what pOTUS or Brennan dictated for public disclosure.
Since Brennan can cauterize passports, why not manipulate FOIA requests? They have taken months or years to comply to requests and the results are impossible to authenticate.
*****Freedom of Information a Joke to Some Agencies
Jul 2nd, 2007 by Dan Gillmor.
“NY Times: Survey Finds Action on Information Requests Can Take Years. The Freedom of Information Act requires a federal agency to provide an initial response to a request within 20 days and to provide the documents in a timely manner. But the oldest pending request uncovered in a new survey of 87 agencies and departments has been awaiting a response for 20 years, and 16 requesters have been waiting more than 15 years for results.”
Corsi had something to say on that subject, but the site won’t download for me, maybe you can bring it up:
http://www.wnd.com/2010/08/187813/
the sub-title is (paraphrased) removed from passport when being an American was dangerous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.