Posted on 12/10/2017 5:08:23 PM PST by Elderberry
In an interview last Friday with “Freedom Friday” host Carl Gallups, Obama birth-certificate lead investigator Mike Zullo revealed for the first time that the “Deep State” prevented a federal investigation of his findings, compiled over a 5+-year period, that the “long-form” birth certificate image posted by the Obama White House in 2011 is a “computer-generated forgery.”
Virtually unknown in the United States prior to the election of Donald J. Trump last year, the term “Deep State” has now been invoked by some newscasters, journalists and commentators as well as by Trump himself through his Twitter account. Left-leaning news outlets reluctantly discussed it beginning in early March, after Trump claimed on Twitter that he and his campaign aides had been “wiretapped” during the final months of the presidential campaign.
On March 9, 2017, Politico Magazine declared, “The Deep State Is a Figment of Steve Bannon’s Imagination,” referring to then-White House Senior Adviser Steve Bannon, now Editor-in-Chief at Breitbart News.
The article begins, featuring a photo of Bannon:
Here’s a handy rule for assessing the credibility of what you’re reading about national security in the Trump era: If somebody uses the term “Deep State,” you can be pretty sure they have no idea what they’re talking about.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
The first paragraph of the Dahling memo (redacted version) says he married Stanley Ann Dunham a United States Citizen in February, 1961. The memo was written two months later in April, 1961.
The unredacted, truncated memo says he got his USC wife “hapei” - hapai is Hawaiian for pregnant.
USC stands for United States Citizen.
Was he married to two USC wives at same time?
That would be bigamy and as McCabe says they could probably deport him for that.
Going through the CBS webpage. The date published is listed as February 9, 2007.
In February, 2007 Steve Kroft of CBS 60 Minutes did an interview with the Obama’s.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-2007-launching-his-candidacy/
My guess would be the photo originally came to CBS from the Obama’s.
Original CBS image.
Right. Have you really thought this through? Let’s say an educated, intelligent person like O Sr was a guest in a foreign country. When asked his race, he decided to look stupid and claim as ‘race,’ the name of a continent. Because, ‘That’s the way we do it in Kenya.’
It could happen.
Except that O Sr was nowhere near the hospital when SA was supposedly filling out the form. So now you have to explain why SA, born in Kansas, would consider the continent of Africa a race.
Of course I realize that this is no challenge to an Obot. They can always, via pure imagination, come up with something. When it comes to making stuff up the Obots are nonpareil. But just to let you know: only your fellow Obots believe the fairytales. The rest of us are not committed to justifying Obama at any price.
You might try getting out of your bubble once in a while.
The 1962 Kenya census instructions specifically instructs them to use African as their race designation. Whites used European.
Link to 1962 census.
http://users.pop.umn.edu/~rmccaa/IPUMSI/CensusForms/Africa/ke1962ef_kenya_enumeration_forms.en.pdf
And of coarse the Marxist Stanley would not list the oppressive term Negro on the form.
Now you’re just showing your ineptitude. My post re O Sr specifically said, “Because that’s the way we do it in Kenya.”
Are you illiterate?
Imbecilic. You have no idea how SA would have filled out the form. In your private Obot fairytale you know, but in the real world you are simply postulating whatever scenario would be most helpful to Obama—just like the good, blindly supportive Obot that you are.
Now all you have to do is calculate whether 1961 came before or after 1966:
‘When did the word Negro become socially unacceptable?
It started its decline in 1966 and was totally uncouth by the mid-1980s. The turning point came when Stokely Carmichael coined the phrase black power at a 1966 rally in Mississippi. Until then, Negro was how most black Americans described themselves. But in Carmichael’s speeches and in his landmark 1967 book, Black Power: The Politics of Liberation in America, he persuasively argued that the term implied black inferiority. Among black activists, Negro soon became shorthand for a member of the establishment. Prominent black publications like Ebony switched from Negro to black at the end of the decade, and the masses soon followed. According to a 1968 Newsweek poll, more than two-thirds of black Americans still preferred Negro, but black had become the majority preference by 1974. Both the Associated Press and the New York Times abandoned Negro in the 1970s, and by the mid-1980s, even the most hidebound institutions, like the U.S. Supreme Court, had largely stopped using Negro.’
I understand the reference to Pete now. Another example of your tilt towards conspiracy theories. An assumption based on no evidence whatsoever. But if it floats your boat, no problem.
Another sign of conspiracy madness is this; you present your ‘smoking gun’ evidence that SAD must have been in Seattle/Vancouver for 10 months because there’s no evidence that she’s in Hawaii and because there’s a Salvation Army Home in WA and there isn’t in Hawaii. When 4Zoltan demolishes the theory by presenting real facts showing that she was there in February for a marriage and there was a SA home in Honolulu, you just dig in deeper and start spraying insults around.
Pete Natufian, I say this without malice. You are not terribly bright. You cannot understand probability theory so you simply pretend it doesn’t exist. You 100% misrepresent my argument because, A, that’s genuinely the best mental grasp you can muster, and B, you can rest assured your fellow Obots are loosely of the same intellectual caliber, and will not understand how completely you have misstated my position.
My philosophy prof used to say most people wouldn’t recognize an argument if it knocked them down in the hallway. From what I have seen, that applies to 100% of Obama’s most ardent defenders/lovers.
If someone offered you a $1,000,000,000 if you could fully and accurately summarize my argument, you’d be out a billion bucks.
Fact.
It’s not the occasion that is of interest, what is of interest is the identity of the girl standing close to the Kenyan student. She’s got to be the reason the numerous fake lei have been added to the image. She’s not Stanley Ann Dunham, although it appears Stanley Armour was present, as was Neil Abercrombie...who has been quoted as saying he saw the Kenyan with ‘Ann’ and her child on social occasions.
The Kenyan student would NOT have identified himself as Negro. This, during a period when the Africans were chanting AFRICAN FOR AFRICANS and demanding self-government. A classification that was to them a huge insult.
If, as is suspected, that LFBC is an amalgamation of various records, therefor the various ‘layers’ then certain aspects of it harken back to the birth of the child in Hawaii that Mary babysat in January 1961. The mother’s name was Ann Obama and that’s why (Stanley) was added in brackets. The birth announcement which doesn’t name the mother, was where Ann S Obama, the student listed in the Polk was living.
Was it proven false that she was in Kenya? Their was a hospital laid claim to being his birthplace at one time but everyone ignored it. Was Taitz discredited?
http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20160504223123/http://www.theobamafile.com/_family/Senior.htm
Senior Arrives In Hawaii
This photo, published in a Honolulu newspaper in 1959 shows [Ann’s father — hands in pockets] Stanley Dunham escorted by uniformed U.S. Navy personnel, greeting Barack Obama Sr., as he arrived in Hawaii from Kenya.”
In the photo, Dunham stands next to Obama smiling. National-security guru Angelo Codevilla contends that the CIA might well have assigned Dunham to keep an eye on Obama, an unwitting pawn in the agency’s mission to woo the emerging African elite.
If Codevilla is right, then Sally Jacobs’ new book is close to all wrong. In her account, Obama arrives, alone and friendless in Hawaii, not surrounded by 20 well-wishers, chief among them a future father-in-law who was not yet supposed to be there.
If the date of the photo can be verified as 1959, Codevilla is likely right, and the mystery deepens.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelo_Codevilla
If someone offered you a $1,000,000,000 if you could fully and accurately summarize my argument, you’d be out a billion bucks.
Fact.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/54015762/Barack-Hussein-Obama-Sr-Immigration-File
page 34 doesn’t name the wife.
page 35 has the name entered after the name of the wife was crossed out.
August 31. No child.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.