I understand the reference to Pete now. Another example of your tilt towards conspiracy theories. An assumption based on no evidence whatsoever. But if it floats your boat, no problem.
Another sign of conspiracy madness is this; you present your ‘smoking gun’ evidence that SAD must have been in Seattle/Vancouver for 10 months because there’s no evidence that she’s in Hawaii and because there’s a Salvation Army Home in WA and there isn’t in Hawaii. When 4Zoltan demolishes the theory by presenting real facts showing that she was there in February for a marriage and there was a SA home in Honolulu, you just dig in deeper and start spraying insults around.
Pete Natufian, I say this without malice. You are not terribly bright. You cannot understand probability theory so you simply pretend it doesn’t exist. You 100% misrepresent my argument because, A, that’s genuinely the best mental grasp you can muster, and B, you can rest assured your fellow Obots are loosely of the same intellectual caliber, and will not understand how completely you have misstated my position.
My philosophy prof used to say most people wouldn’t recognize an argument if it knocked them down in the hallway. From what I have seen, that applies to 100% of Obama’s most ardent defenders/lovers.
If someone offered you a $1,000,000,000 if you could fully and accurately summarize my argument, you’d be out a billion bucks.
Fact.