Are you attempting to mischaracterize what I wrote again? The ONLY thing that I wrote that smacks of anything editorial is "This should make things more interesting in the future of graphic processor competition."
Do you CHALLENGE that assessment?
It certainly is a true statement whether this is part of furthering a formation of a partnership between Intel and AMD, or Intel stabbing AMD in the back after pretending to form a partnership while actually approaching their employees during talks, or totally irrelevant to either of those possibilities . . . it will STILL be interesting in the future.
Why so defensive?
The fact is that, what you wrote or quoted, was not the complete set of facts. If you omit the complete story, you are in effect, lying. There are many ways of lying, and omitting the whole story or the complete story, is a form of lying. That’s a well-known and preferred tactic of the liberal press and liberal politicians.
If you’re going to quote from another story or article, at least try to explain the true meaning of the contents of the story. Just stating that “this should make things more interesting” is no kind of explanation at all.