Why so defensive?
The fact is that, what you wrote or quoted, was not the complete set of facts. If you omit the complete story, you are in effect, lying. There are many ways of lying, and omitting the whole story or the complete story, is a form of lying. That’s a well-known and preferred tactic of the liberal press and liberal politicians.
If you’re going to quote from another story or article, at least try to explain the true meaning of the contents of the story. Just stating that “this should make things more interesting” is no kind of explanation at all.
Why defensive? Your accusatory tone that I somehow am misrepresenting the facts.
Look, adorno. YOU did indeed attack me, and again here and now you are calling me a "liar" for posting an ARTICLE! How demented is THAT????
I merely posted an article that did not include your assumed "complete facts."
Adorno, I did not include those "facts" because they are NOT IN THE ARTICLE. If you want to add them, fine, but don't use the lack of them in the article as an opportunity to attack the messenger as you ALWAYS TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO!
If you’re going to quote from another story or article, at least try to explain the true meaning of the contents of the story.
There is NOTHING here that links this event to the previous story, except in YOUR conspiracy laden mind. I posed the article for people to make their own conclusions of what effect it may have on ALL graphic processor competition in the future. YOU found some obscure conspiracy in that and concluded that I am somehow hiding something. Why would I do that and for what motive? You are delusional.
YOU are demented in your hatred of Apple which you have transplanted to me. This is not even an Apple article but you somehow feel the overwhelming compulsion to attack me in a general tech related article over a completely innocuous comment. . . you are delusional and can find a conspiracy in a sunny day.
SHEESH! GIVE IT A REST, ALREADY!