Posted on 11/10/2017 6:45:58 PM PST by abigkahuna
TexasGurl24 had a post this morning. Very important. Is there a Freeper that has access to Lexus-Nexus to check and see if Corfman had a case in 2007 in Etowah COunty, Alabama and its result and if there are any depositions available, etc...
Roy Moorew has probalby another 24 hours before he is out of the campaign. I heard his radio interview with Hannity. Moore did not help himself. There are many reasons for this for another post further down, but the important issue right now is to see if Corfman had any case in Etowah. Whoever can find this information could very well change the outcome of the election and senate makeup. Good Luck and Godspeed.
Another Freeper found these posts on the Fox Business Facebook page that was talking about this story: https://www.facebook.com/FoxBusiness/?ref=br_rs
Post 1: She is a liar. Some of my family was Pastor to her and she is lying 100%. We know her personally... Terrible woman! She lied on several ministers that we know.
Post 2: .... yes, it is very much so a pattern for her! she has went to various churches within our denomination and accused at least three other pastors besides an uncle of ours, making sexual advances at her. Each time that she brought it to the District board for Alabama they found her to be uncredible and she changed her story many times. Additionally, she tried to sue a pastor in one of the sections within our denomination and the Circuit Judge would not hear the case. This was around 2007 this particular incident took place.
Post 3: Our section Presbyter has been notified and has notified the proper authorities! She is 100% uncredible. This is just an attack on a good Christian man, no doubt she was promised some type of monetary benefit for her lies by someone... I know 100% that she is money hungry and I wish I could go into details of the other situations involving the pastor that she accused. I will say this though I can truthfully say that 3 times out of the four times she accused pastors that we know, she attempted to “ Make a Deal” to not go public with the accusation if she would be compensated an x amount of dollars. That is one reason why the Circuit Judge in the Civil Court dismissed her case with prejudice.
It will be pretty easy to search the Alabama Court records to see if that civil suit was filed by the accuser against a pastor around 2007 and it’s disposition. It’s game over for the ComPost when that becomes public.
The lawyers may have gotten involved. Just a guess though.
If it’s an accurate assessment about the accuser then the woman making the comment won’t be the only one who knows about this.
Run.
Run fast and far from anyone who wishes they could go into more detail.
do you remember every girl you spoke to or lightly dated 40 years ago ???
Im 69 I cant remember every guy I dated and there weren’t that many...I guess I wasn’t impressed...
Yep!
That’s why the posts would need to be corroborated. Can’t apply the same standard of accusations are enough against either side. That’s why I suggested someone searching the court records. Either there was a suit or there wasn’t. That would be called evidence.
I take that back i don’t remember one but I know where we went and what we did. f course I was only 18 and I’m now 70!
My suggestion is to send all this to Beitbart. I’ve sent them tips and eventually they get to them.
That’s a good idea. They would have the ability to corroborate or disprove. They could send someone to the courthouse if necessary to manually look through the records.
Thanks for finding the link !
Bannon’s vetting leaves something to be desired. I would have backed Mo Brooks. Bannon’s MO appears to be to back the loudest candidate. This may backfire big time in AL.
You can delete any comments you have made, but a whole series of every comment would have to be from the originator of the thread I would think.
Sent the facebook link and alabama court system link to Breitbart. If there is a there, there, then Judge Moore lives another day. If there isn’t anything there, then he is done politically before Monday morning. That’s just the way it is.
These are all BS lies! Go back to your cave you turncoat POS!
“...then he is done politically before Monday morning....”
************************************
You are full of crap with your comments. Judge Moore does NOT have to prove his innocence and he won’t be “done politically before Monday morning”. Go hang out with you GOPe & FoxNews buddies and stop trying to spread defeatism here.
I disagree.
Judge Moore has publicly stated he does not know Corfman [the alleged 14 year old victim] and has never met her.
Unless the Washington Post can prove that Judge Moore did know her, this media firestorm is over.
Not trying to spread defeatism House Atreides. Its a PR battle and Judge Moore is losing it at the moment. If he doesn’t have good ammunition tomorrow then he will be politically done by Monday Morning. As I have stated before, Judge Moore needed to sit down for an hour with a PR Crisis consultant to craft the message of Denial, admission of dating age of consent “barely-women” and how he is going to explore his legal paths to fight the defamation of his name and character.
Judge Moore only hit one of the three. Unfortuantely, WAPO threw in the other three “age of consent” dates to conflagulate the whole thing with the main accusation. Judge Moore muddied the waters further with his “awkward” answers regarding dateing “age of consent” girls. It was those awkward answers that cast a shadow on his denial. Hence his political life is in jeopardy. This is not defeatism, its realiaty.
Go back to the “P-Tape” and then candidate Trump. He essentially side-stepped the issue of the tape saying it was lockeroom talk and then launched a firery speech (see rally date around 10-13-2016) Around the same time women crawled out of the woodwork and Trump forcibly denied all accusations and threatened legal action against all fals accusers. They disappeared.
There can be no threat against the three legal “age of consent” dates as there is no real harm done, nor defamation as nothing happened except a kiss. (end of date kiss?) But as for the real accusation, Judge Moore needs to pull out the cannons. He has already lost any republican financial backing, as well as other party support. If he can prove that his accuser is falsely pointing her finger then he wins. So yes, Judge Moore needs to find a way to prove his innocence.
Say he wins, the Republican majority Senate will refuse to seat him. Then what?
So, okay, this is Mitch McConnel playing dirty games, this is democrats and the WAPO up to their old tricks...the reality is that it has and will continue to hurt Judge Roy Moore. He will be done by the end of the weekend unless he finds a way to roll back the tide, innocent or not. Its politics, not a court of law.
Sorry for this armchair observation, but that’s how I see it.
How could and why would you state this?! Hannity lived in Alabama many years ago. But Roy Moore isn't a Bama Svengali and you don't get to decide when the fat lady sings.
Say he wins, the Republican majority Senate will refuse to seat him. Then what?
Judge Moore’s campaign, or media friendly with his campaign need to find out if there actually is a court case in 2007 where Corfman engaged is very simliar behaviour. This has nothing to do as to whether or nor Moore knew Corfman, but as to the character of Corfman making the accusations. If it is shown that Corfman had her case against a Pastor thrown out bya judge because she attempted a shakedown of local pastors, then it goes to character of Corfman, WAPO and Mitch McConnel, McCain, et al. That is all it does.
WAPO as of yet does not have to prove a thing. They already flung the first arrow. Moore can press suit for defamation against both Corfman and WAPO, that would be a proactive approach, otherwise he will either drop out, lose the election, or win the election and refused his seat in the Senate. Its a real ball of confusion here that needs to be unwound quickly for his political sake.
The media firestorm is far from over. You have a religious firebrand of a candidate caught up in a sex scandal with an underage girl. (at least it wasn’t a boy) It has everything...sex, sex, sex and a perceived Holier-than-Thou Candidate. I am not knocking Judge Moore here, its just the way things look out here in tv land. I am surprised they haven’t been flashing a picture of a little girl with ribbons in her hair looking all innocent with lollipops and puppies juxtaposed with darkened images of Moore and a van in the background that has “Free Candy” spray painted on the side.
Look this a battle betwen McConnel and Bannon with Doug Jones thrown in the mix...McConnel has struck a devastating blow to Judge Moore/Bannon, how they get out of this political pickle is unknown. Moore’s interview with Hannity did him no favor.
I am looking at this through a polictical lens, not an innocent/guilty lens.
Personally, after the interview with Hannity, I believe Judge Moore innocent of the real allegation and guilty of the non-crime of dating age of consent “barely-women.” Since dating young women is not a crime, he should have stated that he dated all sorts of women in those years, although he does not remember these three particular women and that he is pursuing his legal paths to combat this offending defamation.
Yes, shame on you, for it is proof that you are a troll. Moldova indeed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.