Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Woops.
1 posted on 11/04/2017 9:48:19 PM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ameribbean expat

Woops squared.


2 posted on 11/04/2017 9:57:53 PM PDT by bluejean (The lunatics are running the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ameribbean expat

Bookmark


3 posted on 11/04/2017 9:59:09 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ameribbean expat
This research seems transphobic. It should be shut down immediately, the records seized and burned.

That's how it will be received in academia.

4 posted on 11/04/2017 10:02:44 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ameribbean expat

“A few of these genes showed sex biased activity in every tissue of the body.”

I’m guessing that the men’s genes were more biased than the woman’s.

Touch something hard - “sex”.
Touch something soft - “sex”
Smell something sweet - “sex”
Smell something like sawdust - “sex”
etc.


5 posted on 11/04/2017 10:03:17 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts FDR's New Deal = obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ameribbean expat

I love their conclusion:

>What do these new insights mean for our progress toward gender equity? A bad outcome could be appeals to return to outdated sexual stereotypes. A good outcome will be recognition of sex differences in medicine and treatment.

Science confirms traditional views of male and female differences, but they can’t admit it.


6 posted on 11/04/2017 10:11:17 PM PDT by JohnyBoy (We should forgive communists, but not before they are hanged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ameribbean expat

There’s no room for science in science.


7 posted on 11/04/2017 10:23:19 PM PDT by mindburglar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ameribbean expat
"jeans act differently ON men and women"

Image result for jeans sexy women

Image result for jeans fat  guy

8 posted on 11/04/2017 10:56:11 PM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Nukes. See my FR page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ameribbean expat

This shouldn’t surprise anyone.


9 posted on 11/04/2017 10:57:49 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ameribbean expat

I liked Wrangler jeans. Does that mean that I was hornier than others? That I was more physical with my “cows”? That “ rawhide” meant something besides cattle wrangling? Does it mean that Rev. Wright’s “ridin’ dirty” didn’t refer to a cattle roundup and drive? How about “drivin’ dirty”? Do jeans have anything to do with that? Did it apply to cars too?

/sarc for the PC infected minds.


10 posted on 11/04/2017 11:24:06 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ameribbean expat

All this money and time to find out that women and men are different.


12 posted on 11/05/2017 1:59:40 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ameribbean expat
What do these new insights mean for our progress toward gender equity? A bad outcome could be appeals to return to outdated sexual stereotypes.

Which stereotypes are "outdated", and which are rooted in general truths?
13 posted on 11/05/2017 4:24:59 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson