Posted on 10/14/2017 10:44:50 AM PDT by tjd1454
It has been scarcely a week since the tsunami hit. On October 6 The New York Times decided it could not afford to be behind the curve as the biggest scandal ever to hit Tinsel town unfolded with all its unseemly tawdriness. The sea change came after decades of coverup and turning a blind eye as one of the most powerful figures in Hollywood roamed like some hulking, unshaven, brute beast, pathologically preying at will upon young starlets....
(Mentions FR) Ironically, some of Weinsteins few remaining supporters were to be found online on conservative discussion boards, where they blamed the victimsuch as the poster on a Free Republic discussion thread, who, in an attempt to deflect blame away from Weinstein, retorted: And what about the whores who serviced him? Others referred to her as slut (fortunately, this was very much a minority opinion on that stellar conservative site)... (Article continues)
Women and Potted Plants hardest hit.
I wouldn't put any higher than amused.
someone called out his despicable defense of Weinstein!
Your idea of defense seems a bit vague.
One wonders what he has to hide, that he should be compelled to excuse sexual predators?
Who, you? Wonder away, fruitloop.
Your blog got moved to chat, your points are invalid.
Wow. Did someone here really say that?
care to enlighten the rest of us as to why your account has been "banned or suspended"? Why should we care one whit what you have to say?
Another lib who thinks the law doesnt apply to libs.
Clearly it has been, since I'm unable to post to you.
Derp.
THIS!!!
"We" who?
Have you a Gerbil in your pocket, or perhaps pressed between your hymnal and your shriveled bosom?
Say what?
Wow you really are unhinged, aren't you?
Yeah, I'm the one posting blog stuff in a big outraged huff.
It’s a pasted pic of a banned account.
How do you think he is posting to you?
Absolute direct quote
Yeah you are the one who started this with your indefensible defense of the likes of Harvey Weinstein.
You seem to be taking all this rather personally.
Did Harvey turn you down for a role in a movie?
I’ve read comments that in fact blamed the victims, particularly the threads where a photo was included. Gross and out of line, very different that suggesting the women where ‘ok’ with it to advance a career.
Report it to the mods and have it taken care of.
Can you explain how it is discredited?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.