Posted on 10/10/2017 7:16:12 AM PDT by Morgana
FULL TITLE: Gay fitness instructor 'killed 18-month-old daughter he called "Satan in a baby grow" just two weeks after formally adopting her with his company director husband'
Matthew Scully-Hicks, 31, is accused of killing 18-month old Elsie after 'assaulting and abusing' her over several months.
The couple first adopted Elsie in September 2015 and the process was finalised nearly eight months later.
But less than two weeks later little Elsie died after suffering traumatic head injuries.
She died at University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, after the decision was taken to switch off her ventilator when doctors decided she would not survive her traumatic head injuries.
After Elsie's tragic death police examined electronic devices owned by Matthew Scully-Hicks - including his iPad.
The court heard on September 22, 2015 - just 12 days after having Elsie - he sent a message to a friend saying: 'I'm going through hell with Elsie!
'Mealtimes and bedtime are like my worst nightmare at the moment.
'She's been up there screaming for 10 minutes non stop. She's just stopped but I doubt that's the last I'll hear tonight.'
That evening he also sent a message to husband Craig calling Elsie 'a psycho.'
On September 29, 2016, he sent the message to Craig describing Elsie as 'Satan dressed up in a baby grow.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
A loving married man and woman were probably denied the chance to adopt Elsie in order that the diversity agenda be filled.
Nothing. There is nothing else.
There is Truth (the Way and the Truth and the Life), and there is the vast, dark void that is untruth ... and which informs entirely too much of modern 'society'.
Why would any society in its right mind give a baby to queers to raise?
This child is lucky that it died early enough to not have an entire life screwed up being raised by these idiots.
It is horrific that they allow a gay male couple to adopt children. I don’t think that lesbian couples should be allowed to adopt children either. It is confusing enough to be a child these days under normal circumstances. There were a lot of lesbians on the fire department I worked for... As a supervisor I sometimes used to sometimes joke in private that they should only allow lesbian women to become firefighters because many were very good at it. But I felt sorry for their kids especially when they got a little older.
Why would any society "in its right mind" tolerate (much less celebrate) faggotry at all?
Put differently: Sodom and Gomorrah got nuked for good reason. God knows what He is doing.
For some adopted children, no matter how much they're loved, they can't get past their demons. Some can't be saved even when they're adopted as babies. It's devastating for the adoptive parents. Of course, the same could be said for bio children though I suspect in smaller numbers.
Yes, both should be severely punished. Both have blood on their hands.
Poor little baby didn’t have a chance.
Good afternoon.
Did the article mention if Scully-Hicks was executed?
5.56mm
Indeed there isn’t any excuse for child abuse. And when social services are more scared about not offending someone over evaluating on a very personal basis for the child’s well-being, we are in deep trouble. It gets even worse when you consider not just the cases where a child was dead from abuse like this one, but all the cases where a child got severely abused but realizing that it passed by and how those in charge of working out the child’s care couldn’t catch it. It shouldn’t be hard to know why there is so much distrust of the government in general.
He got it wrong about who was the psycho in the situation.
What the heck are two gay men adopting a GIRL for?
Am I surprised they abused her? Not in the least.
And then he wonders why she’s screaming.
I hope he burns for this. I will feel no sympathy for him.
Two children in their “care.” They didn’t kill the one with a penis, which leads one to speculate as to why, since neither one seems the least bit nurturing or caring, or even remotely qualified or capable of being a parent.
I have my suspicions. Strong ones.
I have personally much thanks for my wife with regards to our own kids. I got frustrated with them and thankfully she had a way different outlook (more patient and protective) outlook on the children, even when they were insufferable infants who would wake up every 1 or 2 hours at night. At least I think I am well off for being married to a woman who cared a whole lot about our children.
In this situation, the boy was clearly older (3 years old) and probably was also adopted older as well, and maybe not as fussy. But one way or another, it still does worry me that while the boy isn’t dead, that doesn’t mean that there isn’t some degree of negligence.
In this specific case, the 'couple' were homosexuals, with all the emotional and psychological freakishness that is inherent in their disordered mindset. In a sane world they would not have been left unattended with any child, much less have been allowed to adopt.
The blood of this child is on the hands of those who didn't want to judge.
It's a challenging enough task to screen out unstable people who may appear perfectly normal on the outside. Giving a child to those who are openly deviant is a sure way to court disaster.
Oh, I don’t think they’re being inattentive to the boy, no, I suspect he’s getting a lot of inappropriate attention.
Well I guess it’s good that I’ve never cared what people think. Lol
Thanks.
Such a tragedy
Was he convicted?
tHE SECRET IS TO MAKE SURE THEY HAVE LOTS AND LOTS OF ACTIVITY - SO WHEN BEDTIME COMES THEY ARE TIRED OUT
One more example of a U.K. publication being more honest and objective than a U.S. outlet. Can anyone imagine one of the American rags mentioning the characteristic of the actor as “gay” in the article, much less in the title?
What a tragedy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.