Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

I just don’t see how they’re going to get the thrust they need while still keeping the plane light (batteries are heavy!) and they’ll have a terrible turn around time because of long recharging. I don’t think they’ll have an actual plane within a decade.


12 posted on 09/28/2017 6:31:50 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998

You’re thinking of lead-acid batteries. The various types of lithium ion batteries are considerably lighter and more compact. The Tesla automotive battery pack is very thin and serves as the floorboard of their vehicles, sort of like a skateboard and the chassis is nicknamed a skateboard in fact.


25 posted on 09/28/2017 6:42:08 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998
they’ll have a terrible turn around time because of long recharging.

Just like my tools.
One plane, lots of batteries.

37 posted on 09/28/2017 6:54:47 AM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998

Bingo. I really don’t see this being technologically feasible. Small quadcopters and such are a very different thing from a commercial airliner.


47 posted on 09/28/2017 7:06:51 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998

I just don’t see how they’re going to get the thrust they need while still keeping the plane light (batteries are heavy!) and they’ll have a terrible turn around time because of long recharging.

...

According to their website the plan is to use swappable batteries.


50 posted on 09/28/2017 7:10:09 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998

Batteries are heavy eh?

Fuel weight, based on 6.7 lbs per gallon:

747-200B, 361,700 lbs.
DC-10-10, 178,534 lbs.
DC-10-30, 254,700 lbs.
A300B4-200,108,020 lbs.
A300B4-600, 118,390 lbs.
A310-202, 94,800 lbs.
757-200, 78,658 lbs.
767-200, 104,252 lbs.
767-300, 127,300 lbs.
707-320B, 159,898 lbs.
727-200, 70.920 lbs.
737-200, 34,572 lbs.
737-300, 35,912 lbs.
DC-8-55, 156,733 lbs.
DC-8-73, 162,643 lbs.
L-1011-1, 159,560 lbs.
L-1011-200, 178,360 lbs.
L-1011-500, 213,640 lbs.
DC-9-10, 24,273 lbs.
DC-9-50, 28,596 lbs.
DC9-80, 38,725 lbs.


57 posted on 09/28/2017 7:32:59 AM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998

Imagine what will happen if they have to get into a holding pattern.


63 posted on 09/28/2017 7:55:06 AM PDT by raybbr (That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as well say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson