Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored; vooch
Meanwhile, is comment #8 ("article omits that the plain old iphone 8 scored the absolute fastest of all") true?

Yup. it's true.

iPhone 8, iPhone X vs Android flagships: Speed tests say it's not even close
By Liam Tung | September 19, 2017 -- 10:54 GMT (03:54 PDT)

Apple's new A11 Bionic chip is by far the highest-performing system on the market.


Image: Geekbench, Primate Labs

As Apple boasted when unveiling its 64-bit, six-core A11 Bionic, the new SoC would blow away the performance of the A10, which powers the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus.

That claim has now been confirmed in official results for the A11's performance on Primate Labs' Geekbench iOS benchmarks, which were updated today with official measurements for the iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X, which were probably submitted by reviewers.

There's a minor difference in single-core and multicore performance between the three new iPhones, but all three have a massive lead over top-performing Android phones, which are led by Samsung's Galaxy S8 with either its own Exynos octa-core chip or Qualcomm's Snapdragon 835, and Huawei's Honor V9 with its HiSilicon Kirin 960.

geekbenchandroidmulti.jpg

The three new iPhones all have a massive lead over top-performing Android phones, which are led by Samsung's Galaxy S8, here in the multicore test.
Image: Geekbench, Primate Labs

The iOS single-core benchmark shows that the iPhone X, iPhone 8, and iPhone 8 Plus, have scores between 4,204 and 4,181.

The iPhone 8 Plus leads on the multicore benchmark with a score of 10,078, followed closely by the iPhone 8 and iPhone X with scores of 10,065 and 9,955, respectively.

As noted by Apple Insider, a fair comparison is between the A10-powered iPhone 7 and A-11 powered iPhone 8, which share similar specs besides the chip.

The results indicate that the A11 is about 25 percent faster on the single-core test and 80 percent faster in a multicore comparison. And these benchmarks don't even account for the iPhone 8's new Apple-designed GPU, which Apple suggests gives the new iPhone a 30-percent performance lead in graphics over the A10's GPU. http://www.zdnet.com/article/iphone-8-iphone-x-vs-android-flagships-speed-tests-say-its-not-even-close/:869:

Android benchmarks meanwhile top out at 1965 on a measure of single-core performance, while multicore scores don't exceed 6,494. The Galaxy S8 with Samsung's Exynos 8895 octa-core chip lead on both measures.

On single-core performance, the lowly iPhone SE with an A9 chip outranks Samsung's Galaxy S8 on Geekbench.

While Apple has carved out a long lead in performance with its chips,


39 posted on 09/19/2017 5:06:38 PM PDT by Swordmaker (!This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... bet if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker
>> Meanwhile, is comment #8 ("article omits that the plain old iphone 8 scored the absolute fastest of all") true?

> Yup. it's true.

I'm afraid to ask where my trusty iPhone 5c ranks on that chart.

Wait, no I'm not!

"Where does my trusty iPhone 5c rank on that chart?"

49 posted on 09/19/2017 6:47:04 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson