Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did China Hack The 7Th Fleet?
Real Clear Defense ^ | Faiysir | Omaid

Posted on 08/21/2017 8:25:04 AM PDT by Djl3668

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: neverevergiveup

AIS might give you a decent idea of where the other ship is, but not accurately enough to prevent a collision. I don’t think they would rely on it.


41 posted on 08/21/2017 8:51:13 AM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: palmer

It is not a sub...in crowded waters they should be watching with there EYES


42 posted on 08/21/2017 8:52:02 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Djl3668
Did China Hack The 7Th Fleet?

The Chicoms hacked these ships and there is no doubt about this anymore.

The time will come and hopefully soon where we are going to have to punish the Chicoms especially on the Trade front very very soon.

Also, we need to find out who supplied the technology for these folks to become so sophisticated so quickly on the technology front.

We know that their military is stealing us blind throughout all of our high tech companies.

We know for a fact that when an American Chinese, who is employed by a high tech company has to bring back some information like drawings or pics of some high tech items.

The Chinese military is doing this troughout China.

We know that our capabilities are superior than theirs right now but they are stealing us and the whole world blind on any technology that is useful to their military.

43 posted on 08/21/2017 8:54:32 AM PDT by TheConservativeTejano (God Bless Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Or maybe they need to spend more time in Ops Training and less time in Diversity training .... Just sayin ...


Correct. Occam’s razor here. When your command, Sanchez & Sanchez, sounds more like an immigration law firm than a US Navy ship most likely you have a problem. And it’s not the Chicoms hacking the US Navy.


44 posted on 08/21/2017 8:54:57 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PUGACHEV

Once, ok, let it slide. Twice, coincidence? Three times? Wait a fourth? Please.


45 posted on 08/21/2017 8:55:37 AM PDT by Djl3668 (11 Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Intentional collision...


46 posted on 08/21/2017 8:57:11 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Intentional collision...


47 posted on 08/21/2017 8:57:12 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Djl3668

Where do we source our chips, boards and associated electronics? Have we willingly stuck our head into the noose? This is essential equipment. Why would we have subbed it to a nation that is diametrically opposed to everything we believe in, plus they steal everything they get their hands on.


48 posted on 08/21/2017 8:57:12 AM PDT by North Coast Conservative (MAGA It's time to start playing cowboys,muslims, and leftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Djl3668
There is a lack of professionalism displayed in today's Navy.
Whatever happened to sailors standing watch port, starboard and aft?. Too much dependence on radar and other navigational electronics in my estimation. Next thing maritime agencies, worldwide, will be putting out warnings to shipping to stay well clear of U.S. Navy vessels. They're an eminent danger to commercial shipping.
49 posted on 08/21/2017 8:57:49 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

No, it just emphasizes that visual lookouts should be on duty and alert at all times.

Murpy’s Law ALWAYS applies.

These incidents have all occurred during calm times, even if at night.

Command was not doing what it should.


50 posted on 08/21/2017 8:59:13 AM PDT by slorunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Djl3668

capabilities at sea with success.
China has lost a ship in the south China sea wonder if.........


51 posted on 08/21/2017 9:00:51 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DEPcom
Has anyone heard from Elliot Carver lately?
52 posted on 08/21/2017 9:02:03 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike
Intentional collision...

I find it hard to believe that a destroyer could be rammed intentionally by anyone. I think this is the result Obama sought when he spent 8 years degrading our military in every way he could.

53 posted on 08/21/2017 9:03:47 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: slorunner

I agree but just posed the question. There is always the need for visual outlooks. Just like in the Army, we had the Fire Guard routine in the barracks. But now we have to review what and if any of the old lookout routines were eliminated because someone felt just too comfortable with technology. On its face, this tends to look more and more like a failure in the entire chain of command from the Pentagon on procedure.


54 posted on 08/21/2017 9:04:13 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Im sure there was a thorough non- PC investigation and no scapegoating...

Um


55 posted on 08/21/2017 9:04:33 AM PDT by silverleaf (We voted for change, not leftover change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: palmer
“I don’t think they would rely on it.”

Don't know. We're in the era pushing driverless cars and windowless airplanes, so nothing would surprise me.

56 posted on 08/21/2017 9:05:25 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WellyP
They would have to “hack” the receiver on the ship.

No, they can mess with the signal. Much easier and has been done since GPS was invented.

57 posted on 08/21/2017 9:06:04 AM PDT by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Djl3668

Anyone who posits this, or believes it, is completely ignorant of seamanship and the rules of the sea.

These collisions can ONLY happen due to human error, often on a grand scale.

It’s the only possible way.

So, don’t be a dumb ass...do your research.


58 posted on 08/21/2017 9:12:25 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer

When Putin ordered the Kremlin back to IBM Selectrics.....


59 posted on 08/21/2017 9:12:43 AM PDT by txhurl (Dog: 'he's just the cook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Djl3668

Did China take away the watch’s binoculars?


60 posted on 08/21/2017 9:14:16 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson