Sounds like wishful thinking to me.
This should be a slam-dunk case for voluntary manslaughter at the very least. It is very possibly an intentional murder in a fit of rage.
Somali Muslims are raised to consider lightly dressed women out alone at night to be an abomination. Killing an infidel woman under these circumstances is fully justified by Sharia law and custom.
I would consider it likely that the DA has been instructed to slow-walk this case until the public fury has lessened and they can safely drop it for "lack of evidence", or unspecified "mitigating circumstances".
I could be wrong about this speculation (and it would not be the first time for such). Perhaps the DA will get the shooter's partner to testify for the prosecution.
All he needs is one Muslim on the jury. And around there, it’s a gimme. He isn’t going to be convicted of anything.
“Somali Muslims are raised to consider lightly dressed women out alone at night to be an abomination.”
Gee! I like women like that!
except Justine was not “lightly dressed...” and ya know in the winter time I wear sweat pants and a sweat shirt to bed for pyjamas so what she wore could be anything
she may also have had a dressing gown/robe over top we don’t know and the rumor was started by a reporter in the media...
I think they were trying to make the victim look trashy...
what difference does it make what she wore ???
would it have made any difference if she had worn a burka ???
moslems have murdered full costume wearing Catholic nuns...
ahe was deliberately murdered by a Somali moslem...
“This should be a slam-dunk case for voluntary manslaughter at the very least. It is very possibly an intentional murder in a fit of rage.”
Yes, but we don’t need to discard the Bill or Rights to prosecute Noor.