Posted on 05/19/2017 7:59:58 PM PDT by BJ1
I often encounter “pro-marriage” people while gathering stories for the blog. These pro-marriage people come in two varieties.
On the one end of the spectrum are people like Terrell Clemmons and Jennifer Roback Morse, who understand marriage, but who also understand the social changes that have made marriage unattractive for men. Both Clemmons and Morse have a background in STEM fields, so they are able to understand incentives and tradeoffs. They understand that society has to rollback the changes to education, divorce laws, etc. if they expect men to be interested in marriage again. They understand that men are not just accessories of women, but instead have their own desires, feelings and reasons for marrying.
On the other end of the spectrum are feminist men, who are not able to understand the changing incentives that face men in a world that has evolved under the influence of radical feminism. It is just simpler (less thinking) for these men to accept the radical feminism as a given, and then urge men to “man up”. I think a much better idea would be for the “man up” crowd to realize how marriage has changed, and how the schools and the workplace have changed, then make all of these things more attractive to men. It doesn’t do any good to try to “dare” men into jumping off a cliff. Men aren’t stupid, and they do what is in their own best interests. If the man-up crowd wants younger men to marry, then they need to change the incentives offered to men. And that means changing women first.
(Excerpt) Read more at winteryknight.com ...
Here are people smarter than me explaining it. Also if you click the link, you will see a map that shows how single women voted. Conservative men outnumber conservative women.
Countdown until I-finnegan posts feminist shaming language begins now. 10..9..8..7..6..5.......
These men are feminist tools.
Any American male who today wants to marry or has married an American female is nucking futs.
“While the feminist movement may originally have been about equal respect for both sexes, what it has morphed into, she argues, is female privilege.”
It’s safer and the odds are better for any man if he plays Russian Roulette with a half loaded revolver than if he marries an American woman.
You touch on how there’s a growing movement, of American men going overseas to find women who are from other cultures.
There are a number of websites devoted to this very topic. And sites which help set up meetings and travel to meet the women.
Popular countries of origin for these women are countries in Asia such as The Philippines, eastern Europe, and countries of the former Soviet Union.
And the attraction is that American men are seeking women who were raised in other cultures, and don’t have the mindset of liberal American feminist females.
Conservatives are finished unless we MARRY Democrat women and take care of them so they don’t need the government. Remember it’s 53% of WHITE women who voted for Trump. ‘Probably’ married. Wouldn’t you prefer pussy?
>>>Conservatives are finished unless we MARRY Democrat women and take care of them so they don’t need the government. Remember it’s 53% of WHITE women who voted for Trump. ‘Probably’ married. Wouldn’t you prefer pussy?<<<
It’s not worth the aggravation of living with a libtard. Besides those women are all strong and independent. Let them find some guy like pajama boy.
You have to do your best to keep them from getting Americanized.
You have these liberal men married to wives who cheat or have lesbian girlfriends.... and they say it is fine and normal.
Obviously these idiots agree to support a woman and her lovers, yayh! Marriage redefined. Then you have muslim men with 4 wives who are paid by same liberal men paying taxes ro sport these 4 women... last but not least they agree with Obama, that he cannot support his wife, that we should all pay to support her as first lady with a salary...
"Single women" do vote Democrat, but that single women demographic is largely older divorced/widowed women and black women.
If the sex Wars are bad now, just wait about 10 years or so when sex robots will be a real thing.
then things will shift to a completely different level.
It will be more destructive to certain cultures than nuclear weapons.
women provide status and companionship. Sex bots are not going to do that.
I want to be careful how to say this. But I feel that most men really don’t want these “feminist” type women.
Men don’t want to have a woman who is so into her high powered professional career, that family life plays 2nd fiddle in their lives.
Men don’t want a woman who is in competition with them in the career struggle.
Men do greatly appreciate a woman who can take care of everything on the home front, while he brings home the bacon.
Men do want a woman who will comfort them. Men want a woman who wants to be a good mother, and works as hard at being a mother as she does at a paying job.
And men on this site, who are predominantly on the conservative side socially and politically, do not want a liberal wife.
I’m just generalizing here. Of course we can find examples of men who are happy with their wives as part of a power couple. I just don’t think that this is how most men are. I know lots of men, and have discussed a lot of these issues over the years with them. Some of the men are more liberal politically, so some of what I mention here applies to even liberal men.
what man in their right mind wants to get married knowing that at any point his wife could be influenced by some freakin feminists and end up dumping him and taking everything he worked for?
Thanks feminists- you’ve done wonders for civilization
I'm predicting that many men will abandon flesh-and-blood women altogether. And male homosexual relationships will die as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.