Posted on 04/05/2017 5:55:25 AM PDT by Morgana
It’s harsh but what the hell is someone doing in your shower?
The man broke in and took a shower!
Like that man on South Park always said “Drugs are bad M’kay”
The homeowner left that house to go to another house he owned to get a gun to come back to the house where the guy was taking a shower and shot him through the shower curtain; seems since he had time to do all that he could have called 911 - then got his gun and sat on the guy's clothes.
PS: How else would someone be taking a shower if not naked. I mean the story lead intro is a bit ... hmmm
This story from a different source was posted a couple days ago but doesn’t have the info
your posting has regarding some of the details. Especially about them having words prior
to owner leaving to get his gun.
snip
The man owns two pieces of property next door to each other. He lives in one house
and runs an internet-based business next door, which is where he found the intruder.
He told police he noticed signs of forced entry when he went to work on Saturday.
The man said he went inside and found Rosa using the shower.
Police said the homeowner confronted Rosa and the pair exchanged words before he left
and returned to his house next door to retrieve his gun.
The man then allegedly came back to the property and fired multiple rounds into the
shower, killing Rosa, according to Mason County Sheriff’s Lt. Travis Adams.
He then called 911 to report the shooting.
end snip
Posting from a couple days ago
Deputies: Homeowner arrested after fatally shooting intruder in shower (WA)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3540355/posts
111 comments
Note to self: Almost all murderers had their minds in the gutter at the time of the incident. However, many of them always did and always will have their minds in the gutter.
Committing the crime of trespass which is punishable by fines, community service and possibly jail time - not death.
I don't think you understand how the Castle Doctrine works, assuming Washington state even has such protections in their law. The homeowner committed manslaughter at a minimum. Lock him up.
“Had this been Texas would not even have made the news.”
It literally made news in this Texas news station: http://keyetv.com/news/nation-world/deputies-homeowner-shoots-kills-intruder-in-mason-county
This is old news of 3 days ago.
He must have been one of those liberals who armed up after being afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome. No sane conservative would have done what he did.
Would he have shot the intruder if it was a naked FEMALE teacher’s aide? Now it sounds like an erotic fantasy.
Yep, this was murder, possibly in the 2nd degree.
“He gives gun owners a bad name. LOCK HIM UP!”...
This is a no brainer for any judge or jury. The shooter is obviously GUILTY and WILL go to jail.
There’s lots of arguments that could be made but not after he left the house!
He left and was clearly safe and then went back into the supposed danger to attack the criminal.
He was not, as far as I’ve read, protecting a loved one or another person from imminent danger.
It appears that this was just, ‘A criminal is in my house so I get to kill him.’
If the guy had attacked him that would change everything.
If there was a child in the house that might even change things.
But the guy was just trespassing.
I can imagine he may have been scared but a jury may look at his actions and see a guy who is angry and thinking, “I’m going to kill this SOB!”
And that’s not self-defense.
This was a bad shoot.
Did he know the guy? Was he covering up a homosexual affair/fling? Just wondering.
It just seems like something major is missing from this story.
And because premeditated, 1st degree murder.
Once you enter a home, it is no longer a simple trespass. Still, probably not a good idea to kill the guy.
Yep.
He could have left and waited for the cops, reasonable choice.
He could have stayed in the house to protect it without shooting the intruder, another reasonable choice.
Going back with a gun and shooting a man armed with nothing but his swinging cod appears to be an unreasonable choice.
He lives out in the wood. Who would have known of a dead guy? He could have placed the dead guy outside so the badgers could bury him ( like in http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/04/04/522598144/video-badger-burying-a-cow-surprises-scientists ).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.