“In other words, and Morgana can explain how we should actually interpret what she said, it sounds like if you are parents of a child, and one of you dies, if the other can’t get a new husband/wife right away, the surviving parent should give up the child for adoption.”
You know what I meant by that statement. I’ve dealt with the prolife/abortion industry for how long now? Most these women just having babies left and right with no regards as to having a man around. Women’s lib has even told them “you don’t need a man” to raise a baby. Well guess what? You need a man to take your daughter to a father-daughter dance!!!
The article did not say the father was dead, just not there. That is PC white washed for “she had the baby out of wedlock”. Come on we are smart FReepers we can see through that. Had he been dead she would have said so, and played that card big time.
NO this child has a father somewhere. She drains him for child support and he can’t even take her to a dance.
Assumptions is all you got.
People make mistakes. Which of us qualifies to throw the first stone? The 5-year-old who tells a classmate that she has no dad because she’s fat and ugly? I can just hear you correct that classmate by saying, “No, she has no dad because her mom is a whore.” And then everything would be just peachy.
We all know ugly when we see it, except when it looks us in the mirror.
You don’t know any details of this situation. You are making up lies and gossip so you can sound self righteous.
Since none of us know just stop already
Morgana, you’ve made a lot of assumptions for which you have no evidence.
This is rash judgment and it makes further back-and-forth rather a wasted effort.
I do feel sorry for the little girl, because the mother did not make use of the reasonable accommodation offered to her, that she could have recruited any male neighbor, relative or friend as her daughter’s dance partner.