Posted on 02/22/2017 10:34:32 AM PST by Arm_Bears
Apparently, according to Rush, there's a price to be paid for following the law.
It seems that price is always paid by law-abiding citizens.
So are you saying you are okay with law breakers?
When do I get my “free” DREAMER college funds so I can go to college, too? I have paid a hell of a lot more than they have into the system...
When you are wrong....will you tell us?
SECOND THAT!!!!
The dreamer question is a legitimate one, in my opinion. People on both sides can be concerned about the status of little ones brought over.
My opinion. Your mileage may vary.
Good post...............
I’m not ok with law breakers.
But I’m ok with 80% of what we want. Art of the Deal.
Spot on.
You seem to be the only one (or one of few) who are getting this ;-)
Back to the thread title.....what, exactly did Rush say about Dreamers???
(2nd request. TIA)
Agreed. We need to get the Muslims out and the mainstream illegals which will be a fulltime job for years.
“By the way, I am ok with dreamers who turn 16-23 in 2017 and no younger and no older. No criminal record, good school attendance. Younger - get out. Older - get out. Parents - get out.”
All out now. Let their own people take care of them.
No, pepsi-junkie is not full of shit. Trump is going to carve out a niche for Dreamers to stay here. Did you watch his press conference last week? President Trump said:
"They were brought here in such a way — it's a very, very tough subject. We are going to deal with DACA with heart. I have to deal with a lot of politicians, don't forget, and I have to convince them what I'm saying is right. I appreciate your understanding on that, but the DACA situation is a very, very — it's a very difficult thing for me because, you know, I love these kids. I love kids. I have kids. And grandkids."I find it very, very hard doing what the law says exactly to do, and the laws rough. I'm not even talking about new laws, I'm talking about the existing law and the existing law is rough. It's very, very rough. As far as the new order, the new order is going to be very much tailored to the, what I consider to be a very bad decision, but we can tailor the order to that decision and get just about everything, in some ways more, but we're tailoring it now to the decision."
It’s a tough world. I pay half my income to taxes. They need to GTHOOMC.
Correct
You post no link and are posting mere hearsay. Stop cluttering up the news page. This belongs in chat.
We definitely need to end anchor babies. We need to only allow births of citizens or legal residents to grant auto citizenship.
“I was listening to Rush. He basically said that deporting the more criminal elements of illegal aliens take precedent over the dreamers. We can only do so much at a time and we need to prioritize.”
That is how I heard it. The dreamers will be tended to but they are down the list of priorities.
Then, I had an epiphany.
If I committed a felony - doesn't matter what - would the court say, "Well, WBill has kids and it would be really inconvenient to them if we locked him up. They'd have financial hardships, as well as being deprived of a main caregiver. So....let's just give him a pass, this once."
Heck no. They'd lock me up and toss the key. I'd not expect anything else.
So, why should the DREAMERs be treated any differently?
Thank you.
Since when was Rush Limbaugh elected President???
He has his OPINIONS that he wants to entertain his radio show listeners with...
I haven’t heard President Trump (not Limbaugh) say anything yet about Dreamers and until I do, I will wait, but people’s opinions are like buttholes, everybody has one...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.